also sprach Jerry Lynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.02.25.2218 +0100]:
> I just wouldn't suggest anyone use BIND is the same sense that I wouldn't
> suggest they
> ride a Harley naked on snow-packed icy roads... something bad's bound to
> happen...
you are asking for it... i would consider my BIND
also sprach Jerry Lynde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.02.25.2218 +0100]:
> I just wouldn't suggest anyone use BIND is the same sense that I wouldn't
> suggest they
> ride a Harley naked on snow-packed icy roads... something bad's bound to
> happen...
you are asking for it... i would consider my BIN
Quoting Sven Hoexter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You forgot to mention that you can chroot bind since a 8.x release.
Yup ! :)
> The chroot is not the non plus ultra solution but it throws a few more stones
> in the way of the script kiddies.
..and it is even quite maintainable in a chroot, when runn
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
>> I'm still under the impression that it's quite possible to do a
>> reasonably secure bind install. Bind9 has some nice security-related
>> features, and a completely rewritten codebase (as opposed to bind8). I'm
>> not sure what insecurities you'd
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:59:20PM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Quoting Jerry Lynde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > At 12:15 PM 2/25/2002, Robert wrote:
Hi,
> > I just wouldn't suggest anyone use BIND is the same sense that I wouldn't
> > suggest they
> > ride a Harley naked on snow-packed icy
Quoting Sven Hoexter ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> You forgot to mention that you can chroot bind since a 8.x release.
Yup ! :)
> The chroot is not the non plus ultra solution but it throws a few more stones
> in the way of the script kiddies.
..and it is even quite maintainable in a chroot, when run
Sven Hoexter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[snip]
>> I'm still under the impression that it's quite possible to do a
>> reasonably secure bind install. Bind9 has some nice security-related
>> features, and a completely rewritten codebase (as opposed to bind8). I'm
>> not sure what insecurities you'
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:59:20PM +0100, Robert van der Meulen wrote:
> Quoting Jerry Lynde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > At 12:15 PM 2/25/2002, Robert wrote:
Hi,
> > I just wouldn't suggest anyone use BIND is the same sense that I wouldn't
> > suggest they
> > ride a Harley naked on snow-packed ic
Quoting Jerry Lynde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> At 12:15 PM 2/25/2002, Robert wrote:
> >It also has a much more anal license (much!!)
>
> True, true...
>
> But Michael was asking for secure, not non-anal licensing... I don't expect
> he was gonna try and hack BIND or djbdns or anything else...
Nahh
There is a couple of interesting answers, but nothing to help me with
my imagine, but I am (maybe) too exacting to find a real (little more
described) way to setup the webhosting with my needs.
Anyway, is there any doc or something what can help me setup
webhosting by my imagine
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:18:29PM -0700, Jerry Lynde wrote:
> True, true...
> But Michael was asking for secure, not non-anal licensing... I don't expect
> he was gonna
> try and hack BIND or djbdns or anything else...
> I just wouldn't suggest anyone use BIND is the same sense that I wouldn't
At 12:15 PM 2/25/2002, Robert wrote:
Quoting Jerry Lynde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> For secure DNS service, I suggest djbdns. It's much more secure than BIND.
> Much!!
It also has a much more anal license (much!!)
Greets,
Robert
True, true...
But Michael was asking for secure, not non-a
Quoting Jerry Lynde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> At 12:15 PM 2/25/2002, Robert wrote:
> >It also has a much more anal license (much!!)
>
> True, true...
>
> But Michael was asking for secure, not non-anal licensing... I don't expect
> he was gonna try and hack BIND or djbdns or anything else...
Nah
There is a couple of interesting answers, but nothing to help me with
my imagine, but I am (maybe) too exacting to find a real (little more
described) way to setup the webhosting with my needs.
Anyway, is there any doc or something what can help me setup
webhosting by my imagine
Quoting Jerry Lynde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> For secure DNS service, I suggest djbdns. It's much more secure than BIND.
> Much!!
It also has a much more anal license (much!!)
Greets,
Robert
--
Linux Generation
encrypted mail preferred. finger [EMAIL PROTE
At 05:30 PM 2/23/2002, Rishi L Khan wrote:
> My imagine:
> 1. Apache with PHP, and some cgi could be enabled (perl, etc.)
> 2. FTP for each Apache web
Use ssh and scp or sftp instead.
> 3. Some e-mails for each web (better with webmail+antivir)
IMAP or POP3 over SSL ...
> 4. Primary DNS
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:18:29PM -0700, Jerry Lynde wrote:
> True, true...
> But Michael was asking for secure, not non-anal licensing... I don't expect
> he was gonna
> try and hack BIND or djbdns or anything else...
> I just wouldn't suggest anyone use BIND is the same sense that I wouldn't
Quoting Jerry Lynde ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> For secure DNS service, I suggest djbdns. It's much more secure than BIND.
> Much!!
It also has a much more anal license (much!!)
Greets,
Robert
--
Linux Generation
encrypted mail preferred. finger [EMAIL PROT
At 05:30 PM 2/23/2002, Rishi L Khan wrote:
> > My imagine:
> > 1. Apache with PHP, and some cgi could be enabled (perl, etc.)
> > 2. FTP for each Apache web
>Use ssh and scp or sftp instead.
>
> > 3. Some e-mails for each web (better with webmail+antivir)
>IMAP or POP3 over SSL ...
>
> > 4.
Op 2/24/02, 12:44:07 AM, schreef Michal Novotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> over
het thema webhosting:
> Hello all!
Hi
> I would want to have my own webhosting (for friends etc.), could
> someone help me how to set up a debian for it, if there is better have
> for each web sp
Op 2/24/02, 12:44:07 AM, schreef Michal Novotny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> over
het thema webhosting:
> Hello all!
Hi
> I would want to have my own webhosting (for friends etc.), could
> someone help me how to set up a debian for it, if there is better have
> for each web sp
> My imagine:
> 1. Apache with PHP, and some cgi could be enabled (perl, etc.)
> 2. FTP for each Apache web
Use ssh and scp or sftp instead.
> 3. Some e-mails for each web (better with webmail+antivir)
IMAP or POP3 over SSL ...
> 4. Primary DNS server for each web
Only one DNS server serve
Hello all!
I would want to have my own webhosting (for friends etc.), could
someone help me how to set up a debian for it, if there is better have
for each web special user or what ?
My imagine:
1. Apache with PHP, and some cgi could be enabled (perl, etc.)
2. FTP for each Apache web
3
> My imagine:
> 1. Apache with PHP, and some cgi could be enabled (perl, etc.)
> 2. FTP for each Apache web
Use ssh and scp or sftp instead.
> 3. Some e-mails for each web (better with webmail+antivir)
IMAP or POP3 over SSL ...
> 4. Primary DNS server for each web
Only one DNS server serv
Hello all!
I would want to have my own webhosting (for friends etc.), could
someone help me how to set up a debian for it, if there is better have
for each web special user or what ?
My imagine:
1. Apache with PHP, and some cgi could be enabled (perl, etc.)
2. FTP for each Apache web
25 matches
Mail list logo
