Re: testing/Release not signed by the same key than non-US/testing/Release

2003-12-09 Thread Romain Francoise
Sebastien Chaumat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone explain why testing/Release is signed with the key id : > 30B34DD5 (which I can't trust because I can't find any valid/trustable > source for it) whereas non-US/testing/Release is correctly signed with > ftp-master 2003 key ? It's the

Re: testing/Release not signed by the same key than non-US/testing/Release

2003-12-09 Thread Romain Francoise
Sebastien Chaumat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Can someone explain why testing/Release is signed with the key id : > 30B34DD5 (which I can't trust because I can't find any valid/trustable > source for it) whereas non-US/testing/Release is correctly signed with > ftp-master 2003 key ? It's the

testing/Release not signed by the same key than non-US/testing/Release

2003-12-09 Thread Sebastien Chaumat
Hi, Can someone explain why testing/Release is signed with the key id : 30B34DD5 (which I can't trust because I can't find any valid/trustable source for it) whereas non-US/testing/Release is correctly signed with ftp-master 2003 key ? Thanks, SEb P.S : sorry if it was ask there before I do n

testing/Release not signed by the same key than non-US/testing/Release

2003-12-09 Thread Sebastien Chaumat
Hi, Can someone explain why testing/Release is signed with the key id : 30B34DD5 (which I can't trust because I can't find any valid/trustable source for it) whereas non-US/testing/Release is correctly signed with ftp-master 2003 key ? Thanks, SEb P.S : sorry if it was ask there before I do n