On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 05:16:20AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 03:04:35PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña
> wrote:
> >
> > One thing I wonder is why does not Debian issue advisories to popular
> > mailing
> > lists (linux-security on securityportal and bugtrack
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 05:16:20AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 03:04:35PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña wrote:
> >
> > One thing I wonder is why does not Debian issue advisories to popular mailing
> > lists (linux-security on securityportal and bugtrack on sec
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
[snip]
> i am a bit curious about the recent traceroute bug, (traceroute -g 1
> -g 1 segfaults) pretty much every other major dist has released an
> advisory and update for this, but debian appears not to have (unless i
> missed it). a fixed traceroute pac
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 03:04:35PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> One thing I wonder is why does not Debian issue advisories to popular
> mailing
> lists (linux-security on securityportal and bugtrack on securityfocus comes to
they do post announcments to BugTraq, at leas
One thing I wonder is why does not Debian issue advisories to popular
mailing
lists (linux-security on securityportal and bugtrack on securityfocus comes to
mind). Also, I do not see this posted at security.debian.org
I am currently maintaining my status as Debian maintainer but s
Actually, debian WAS vulnerable to it.
It's a glibc problem (format string problem). You can update it.
http://security.debian.org
apt-get upgrade glibc
Le lun, 09 oct 2000, Robert Varga a écrit :
> There is a su exploit discussed at SecurityPortal which is working on
> RedHat 6.2
> (http://www
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
[snip]
> i am a bit curious about the recent traceroute bug, (traceroute -g 1
> -g 1 segfaults) pretty much every other major dist has released an
> advisory and update for this, but debian appears not to have (unless i
> missed it). a fixed traceroute pa
On Mon, Oct 09, 2000 at 03:04:35PM +0200, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Peña wrote:
>
> One thing I wonder is why does not Debian issue advisories to popular mailing
> lists (linux-security on securityportal and bugtrack on securityfocus comes to
they do post announcments to BugTraq, at least
One thing I wonder is why does not Debian issue advisories to popular mailing
lists (linux-security on securityportal and bugtrack on securityfocus comes to
mind). Also, I do not see this posted at security.debian.org
I am currently maintaining my status as Debian maintainer but s
Actually, debian WAS vulnerable to it.
It's a glibc problem (format string problem). You can update it.
http://security.debian.org
apt-get upgrade glibc
Le lun, 09 oct 2000, Robert Varga a écrit :
> There is a su exploit discussed at SecurityPortal which is working on
> RedHat 6.2
> (http://ww
There is a su exploit discussed at SecurityPortal which is working on
RedHat 6.2
(http://www.securityportal.com/research/exploits/linux/20001003-linux-su.txt)
Is debian vulnerable to it?
And there is another regarding ssh.
Regards,
Robert Varga
There is a su exploit discussed at SecurityPortal which is working on
RedHat 6.2
(http://www.securityportal.com/research/exploits/linux/20001003-linux-su.txt)
Is debian vulnerable to it?
And there is another regarding ssh.
Regards,
Robert Varga
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
12 matches
Mail list logo
