On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:48:15PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > BTW, I don't understand why this was posted to debian-curiosa, either.
> >
> > I got into the habit of reading important announcements for the users
> > on http://planet.debian.net. Now it seems debian-curiosa is another place
>
* Michael Stone:
> The current problem isn't a bandwidth problem, but it is related to
> people downloading the X update.
The available bandwidth is not sufficient for dealing with an X11
update, at least in the usual way (pushing everything that's built by
the source packages, and not just the v
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:22:18PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
The link to the outside world is fully saturated currently.
There are ideas discussed how we can add more machines / bandwith, but
that's not a short-term solution.
The current problem isn't a bandwidth problem, but it is related to
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:45:37PM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> I wonder what else should I read to keep in touch with such important
> information?
slashdot? ;)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050919 22:46]:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:04:14PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > BTW, I don't understand why this was posted to debian-curiosa, either.
>
> I got into the habit of reading important announcements for the users
> on http://planet.
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:04:14PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> BTW, I don't understand why this was posted to debian-curiosa, either.
I got into the habit of reading important announcements for the users
on http://planet.debian.net. Now it seems debian-curiosa is another place
for them.
I won
* Steve Kemp:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:29PM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
>
>> anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-curiosa/2005/09/msg00018.html
The MRTG output is broken (as suggested by the straight line). Real
port utilization
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:29PM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
> anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-curiosa/2005/09/msg00018.html
There is an advisory pending ...
Steve
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Am Montag, den 19.09.2005, 15:24 -0400 schrieb Noah Meyerhans:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:29PM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
> > anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
> > The whole day I get timeouts but I could update xfree(woody)/xorg(sarge)
> > on some machine but I didn't
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:18:29PM +0200, No?l K?the wrote:
> anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
> The whole day I get timeouts but I could update xfree(woody)/xorg(sarge)
> on some machine but I didn't find the DSA for it.
>
> Any information about this?
See http://lists
* Noèl Köthe ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050919 21:19]:
> anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
The link to the outside world is fully saturated currently.
There are ideas discussed how we can add more machines / bandwith, but
that's not a short-term solution.
> The whole day I get
Hello,
anybody knows what's the problem with klecker/security.d.o?
The whole day I get timeouts but I could update xfree(woody)/xorg(sarge)
on some machine but I didn't find the DSA for it.
Any information about this?
thx.
--
Noèl Köthe
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
12 matches
Mail list logo
