Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-29 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 03:18:57AM -0400, George Georgalis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:59:12PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote: > >On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Dan Christensen wrote: > >> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-29 Thread Eric Dantan Rzewnicki
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 03:18:57AM -0400, George Georgalis wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:59:12PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote: > >On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Dan Christensen wrote: > >> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 06:16:17PM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:00:11AM -0400, Dan Christensen wrote: Hi, > > I've heard really good things about crm114: > > > > http://crm114.sourceforge.net/ > > > > It's faster than spamassassin and more accurate than

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:00:11AM -0400, Dan Christensen wrote: > George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > SA seems the only real choice for an OSS spam filter > > I've heard really good things about crm114: > > http://crm114.sourceforge.net/ > > It's faster than spamassassin and m

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread Dan Christensen
George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > SA seems the only real choice for an OSS spam filter I've heard really good things about crm114: http://crm114.sourceforge.net/ It's faster than spamassassin and more accurate than spamassassin or the author. Licensed under the GPL. It only doe

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread Dan Christensen
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Dan Christensen wrote: >> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >So when I'm getting a large amount of me

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread Sven Hoexter
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 06:16:17PM +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:00:11AM -0400, Dan Christensen wrote: Hi, > > I've heard really good things about crm114: > > > > http://crm114.sourceforge.net/ > > > > It's faster than spamassassin and more accurate than

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 11:00:11AM -0400, Dan Christensen wrote: > George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > SA seems the only real choice for an OSS spam filter > > I've heard really good things about crm114: > > http://crm114.sourceforge.net/ > > It's faster than spamassassin and m

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread Dan Christensen
George Georgalis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > SA seems the only real choice for an OSS spam filter I've heard really good things about crm114: http://crm114.sourceforge.net/ It's faster than spamassassin and more accurate than spamassassin or the author. Licensed under the GPL. It only doe

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread Dan Christensen
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Dan Christensen wrote: >> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >So when I'm getting a large amount of me

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread George Georgalis
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:59:12PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote: >On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Dan Christensen wrote: >> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >So when I'm getting a

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread George Georgalis
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:59:12PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote: >On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Dan Christensen wrote: >> Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >So when I'm getting a

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-28 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Dan Christensen wrote: > Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >>> So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 spamc/spamd runni

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-27 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Dan Christensen wrote: > Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >>> So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 spamc/spamd runni

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-27 Thread Dan Christensen
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >> >>>So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 >>>spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. >> >> I suspect if

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-27 Thread Dan Christensen
Daniel Pittman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >> >>>So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 >>>spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. >> >> I suspect if

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-27 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Emmanuel Lacour wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:08:05PM +0200, Thomas Schuering wrote: >> Hi, >> >> > So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. >> > 15-20 spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. How can I do >> > this. >> >> /usr/sbin/spamd

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-27 Thread Emmanuel Lacour
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:08:05PM +0200, Thomas Schuering wrote: > Hi, > > > So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 > > spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. How can I do this. > > /usr/sbin/spamd -d -m 5 > > '-d' : daemonize > '-m 5': Allow m

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-27 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Emmanuel Lacour wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:08:05PM +0200, Thomas Schuering wrote: >> Hi, >> >> > So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. >> > 15-20 spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. How can I do >> > this. >> >> /usr/sbin/spamd

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread Emmanuel Lacour
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 07:08:05PM +0200, Thomas Schuering wrote: > Hi, > > > So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 > > spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. How can I do this. > > /usr/sbin/spamd -d -m 5 > > '-d' : daemonize > '-m 5': Allow m

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: > >>I have a 'spam' user, and I've set up postfix, to run a tiny little >>script as this 'spam' user. This script accepts messages thru the >>stdin, and it filters the message thru the spamd daemon

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread George Georgalis
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >I have a 'spam' user, and I've set up postfix, to run a tiny little >script as this 'spam' user. This script accepts messages thru the >stdin, and it filters the message thru the spamd daemon with the spamc >client. After the filtering, it

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread Daniel Pittman
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004, George Georgalis wrote: > On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: > >>I have a 'spam' user, and I've set up postfix, to run a tiny little >>script as this 'spam' user. This script accepts messages thru the >>stdin, and it filters the message thru the spamd daemon

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread George Georgalis
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: >I have a 'spam' user, and I've set up postfix, to run a tiny little >script as this 'spam' user. This script accepts messages thru the >stdin, and it filters the message thru the spamd daemon with the spamc >client. After the filtering, it

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: > So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 > spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. How can I do this. The First of all, this is OT for debian-security. It should have gone to debian-user. Second, RTFM

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread Thomas Schuering
Hi, On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: > > So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 > spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. How can I do this. /usr/sbin/spamd -d -m 5 '-d': daemonize '-m 5' : Allow maximum 5 children Just checkou

restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread LeVA
Hi! I'm using spamassassin on my system (Pentium-MMX 233 w/ 160Mb RAM), and it works fine, if I get small amount of messages. But when I get a lot of messages, the ultra-fast 233MHz processor can not take it, and it gets very slooow. My setup looks like this: I have a 'spam' user, and I've set

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread Noah Meyerhans
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: > So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 > spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. How can I do this. The First of all, this is OT for debian-security. It should have gone to debian-user. Second, RTFM

Re: restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread Thomas Schuering
Hi, On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 06:44:35PM +0200, LeVA wrote: > > So when I'm getting a large amount of messages there is approx. 15-20 > spamc/spamd running. I want to limit this to ~5. How can I do this. /usr/sbin/spamd -d -m 5 '-d': daemonize '-m 5' : Allow maximum 5 children Just checkou

restricting process limit

2004-04-26 Thread LeVA
Hi! I'm using spamassassin on my system (Pentium-MMX 233 w/ 160Mb RAM), and it works fine, if I get small amount of messages. But when I get a lot of messages, the ultra-fast 233MHz processor can not take it, and it gets very slooow. My setup looks like this: I have a 'spam' user, and I've set