On Oct 12, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
> On Oct 1, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> On 10/01/2012 06:32 PM, Stephen Lombardo wrote:
>>> Hello Florian,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Okay. Can your fork open unencry
On Oct 1, 2012, at 7:36 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On 10/01/2012 06:32 PM, Stephen Lombardo wrote:
>> Hello Florian,
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> Okay. Can your fork open unencrypted databases? Are there any symbol
>>> collisions with vanilla SQLite
On 10/01/2012 06:32 PM, Stephen Lombardo wrote:
> Hello Florian,
>
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Okay. Can your fork open unencrypted databases? Are there any symbol
>> collisions with vanilla SQLite?
>>
> Yes, SQLCipher can open standard, unencrypted SQLite database
Hello Florian,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 1:57 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> Okay. Can your fork open unencrypted databases? Are there any symbol
> collisions with vanilla SQLite?
>
Yes, SQLCipher can open standard, unencrypted SQLite databases without a
problem and it has the same public API and
Hello Hans,
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On 09/28/2012 04:23 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Why isn't it implemented as a VFS plugin?
>
> I don't know of any other precedent for a VFS plugin for adding
> encryption support, do you? Maybe Stephen can speak more
* Stephen Lombardo:
> I agree that implementing SQLCipher using a VFS plugin would work, and
> we've considered it in the past. However, we've decided to stick with the
> codec approach for now, given that some functionality could prove more
> complex to implement and a major shift / rewrite could
On 09/28/2012 04:23 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Hans-Christoph Steiner:
>
>> The tricky part is that it is a modified version of SQLite3, and lintian
>> properly gives an error about that. But because of the features that
>> SQLCipher provides, it must modify the core of SQLite to work, therefore
* Hans-Christoph Steiner:
> The tricky part is that it is a modified version of SQLite3, and lintian
> properly gives an error about that. But because of the features that
> SQLCipher provides, it must modify the core of SQLite to work, therefore
> it cannot be made into a plugin.
Why isn't it im
Hey all,
I'm reading to upload a new package called SQLCipher
(http://sqlcipher.net/) and I want to run it by y'all first. The upside
is that it provides AES256 encrypted SQLite databases in a DFSG-free
package that has been pretty widely tested, deployed and audited. You
can find out more here
9 matches
Mail list logo
