Hello Anup,
this is a Linux-Mailinglist and not for DOS and its networking tools.
Am 2006-02-22 15:12:16, schrieb Anup:
> Dear Sir,
>
> Good afternoon.
>
> When I am giving command in DOS prompt,Bellow message showing.
>
> "C:/>ping 10.246.240.1
> 'ping' is not recognized as an internal or ext
Dear Sir,
Good afternoon.
When I am giving command in DOS prompt,Bellow
message showing.
"C:/>ping
10.246.240.1
'ping' is not recognized as an internal or
external command,operable
program or batch file.
So could u plz provide me
solution.
Best regards
Anup
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It leads to better solutions :)
And fun and entertainment along the way!
--
Sam Couter | Internet Engineer | http://www.topic.com.au/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| tSA Consulting |
OpenPGP key ID: DE89C75C, available on key se
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It leads to better solutions :)
And fun and entertainment along the way!
--
Sam Couter | Internet Engineer | http://www.topic.com.au/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]| tSA Consulting |
OpenPGP key ID: DE89C75C, available on key s
Am Mit, 12. Dez 2001, 15:02:40 +0200 schrieb Halil Demirezen:
> How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
> "ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system starts not to give
> response and the load average of the cpu raises to the %81.
>
> and i can manage this unde
Previously Ade Talabi wrote:
> Hey! why are u guys always arguing
It leads to better solutions :)
Wichert.
--
_
/[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.li
A suggestion does not necessarily have to solve the problem, it might to view
the problem from another angle.
Hey! why are u guys always arguing
Rolf Kutz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said thusly on [12/12/01 at 14:36]:
> Gergely Trifonov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > i did not say it'd solve
Just a thought...(no ill intent)...
If a ping command is taking up THAT much processor power, might it be time
to upgrade?
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Halil Demirezen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:02 AM
Subject: ping problem
> How can i
Gergely Trifonov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> i did not say it'd solve the problem, i only suggested a solution
> instead of removing ping.
If it doesn't solve the problem, it's no solution.
-Rolf
i did not say it'd solve the problem, i only suggested a solution
instead of removing ping.
On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 14:20, Rolf Kutz wrote:
> Gergely Trifonov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > it's okay if you just remove the setuid bit from /bin/ping (chmod -s
> > /bin/ping), so users won't be abl
Gergely Trifonov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> it's okay if you just remove the setuid bit from /bin/ping (chmod -s
> /bin/ping), so users won't be able to run it
This doesn't help. Luser will be able to create a
100% load with any command, so this doesn't help
and ping is a useful tool. Try uli
Previously Gergely Trifonov wrote:
> it's okay if you just remove the setuid bit from /bin/ping (chmod -s
> /bin/ping), so users won't be able to run it
That doesn't solve the real problem, which is not the fact that the
user runs ping but that he can run too many processes starving
machinen reso
Halil Demirezen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
> "ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system starts not to give
> response and the load average of the cpu raises to the %81.
>
> how can i solve this system problem..
You c
Previously Halil Demirezen wrote:
> How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
> "ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system starts not to give
> response and the load average of the cpu raises to the %81.
Look at the PAM limits documentation.
Wichert.
--
___
it's okay if you just remove the setuid bit from /bin/ping (chmod -s
/bin/ping), so users won't be able to run it
On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 14:02, Halil Demirezen wrote:
> How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
> "ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system start
How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
"ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system starts not to give
response and the load average of the cpu raises to the %81.
and i can manage this under an ordinary user account.
So a normal user can make the whole system
Am Mit, 12. Dez 2001, 15:02:40 +0200 schrieb Halil Demirezen:
> How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
> "ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system starts not to give
> response and the load average of the cpu raises to the %81.
>
> and i can manage this und
Previously Ade Talabi wrote:
> Hey! why are u guys always arguing
It leads to better solutions :)
Wichert.
--
_
[EMAIL PROTECTED] This space intentionally left occupied \
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.li
A suggestion does not necessarily have to solve the problem, it might to view the
problem from another angle.
Hey! why are u guys always arguing
Rolf Kutz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said thusly on [12/12/01 at 14:36]:
> Gergely Trifonov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > i did not say it'd solve
Just a thought...(no ill intent)...
If a ping command is taking up THAT much processor power, might it be time
to upgrade?
Phil
- Original Message -
From: Halil Demirezen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 8:02 AM
Subject:
Gergely Trifonov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> i did not say it'd solve the problem, i only suggested a solution
> instead of removing ping.
If it doesn't solve the problem, it's no solution.
-Rolf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
i did not say it'd solve the problem, i only suggested a solution
instead of removing ping.
On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 14:20, Rolf Kutz wrote:
> Gergely Trifonov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > it's okay if you just remove the setuid bit from /bin/ping (chmod -s
> > /bin/ping), so users won't be ab
Gergely Trifonov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> it's okay if you just remove the setuid bit from /bin/ping (chmod -s
> /bin/ping), so users won't be able to run it
This doesn't help. Luser will be able to create a
100% load with any command, so this doesn't help
and ping is a useful tool. Try ul
Previously Gergely Trifonov wrote:
> it's okay if you just remove the setuid bit from /bin/ping (chmod -s
> /bin/ping), so users won't be able to run it
That doesn't solve the real problem, which is not the fact that the
user runs ping but that he can run too many processes starving
machinen res
Halil Demirezen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
> "ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system starts not to give
> response and the load average of the cpu raises to the %81.
>
> how can i solve this system problem..
You
Previously Halil Demirezen wrote:
> How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
> "ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system starts not to give
> response and the load average of the cpu raises to the %81.
Look at the PAM limits documentation.
Wichert.
--
__
it's okay if you just remove the setuid bit from /bin/ping (chmod -s
/bin/ping), so users won't be able to run it
On Wed, 2001-12-12 at 14:02, Halil Demirezen wrote:
> How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
> "ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system star
How can i solve the problem that after i ping my computer(server) with
"ping localhost&" for about 160 times, the system starts not to give
response and the load average of the cpu raises to the %81.
and i can manage this under an ordinary user account.
So a normal user can make the whole syste
28 matches
Mail list logo
