Re: libsnmp security update

2008-06-01 Thread Alex Samad
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:17:54AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alex Samad: > > > speaking from experience, I could have missed something, but when I > > unencrypted a encrypted private key it all worked (i used openssl), my > > presumption (and this might be were I am making a mistake) is tha

Re: libsnmp security update

2008-05-29 Thread Alex Samad
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:17:54AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alex Samad: > > > speaking from experience, I could have missed something, but when I > > unencrypted a encrypted private key it all worked (i used openssl), my > > presumption (and this might be were I am making a mistake) is tha

Re: libsnmp security update

2008-05-29 Thread Florian Weimer
* Alex Samad: > speaking from experience, I could have missed something, but when I > unencrypted a encrypted private key it all worked (i used openssl), my > presumption (and this might be were I am making a mistake) is that the > format for x509 cert's is a standard. I will follow up on this T

Re: libsnmp security update

2008-05-28 Thread Alex Samad
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:11:49PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alex Samad: > > >> Perl 5.10 has entered testing, so this shouldn't be a problem. You > >> probably have got some locally-installed package (or a package > >> temporarily removed from testing due to incompatibility with Perl 5.10

Re: libsnmp security update

2008-05-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Alex Samad: >> Perl 5.10 has entered testing, so this shouldn't be a problem. You >> probably have got some locally-installed package (or a package >> temporarily removed from testing due to incompatibility with Perl 5.10). > > the problem is I am pinning ldap-utils, because it is the last know

Re: libsnmp security update

2008-05-28 Thread Alex Samad
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 12:20:46PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alex Samad: > > >> Which version of libsnmp15 are you trying to install, on which > >> architecture? > > > 5.4.1~dfsg-7.1 depends on libperl5.10 which depends on perl-base =5.10 > > and this brings along the conflict > > Perl 5.

Re: libsnmp security update

2008-05-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Alex Samad: >> Which version of libsnmp15 are you trying to install, on which >> architecture? > 5.4.1~dfsg-7.1 depends on libperl5.10 which depends on perl-base =5.10 > and this brings along the conflict Perl 5.10 has entered testing, so this shouldn't be a problem. You probably have got som

Re: libsnmp security update

2008-05-28 Thread Alex Samad
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:30:47AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Alex Samad: > > > I have noticed the latest libsnmp15 update, but I have been unable to > > install, because this has dependancies on perl >= 5.10 which eventual > > leads me to ldap-utils. > > Which version of libsnmp15 are you

Re: libsnmp security update

2008-05-28 Thread Florian Weimer
* Alex Samad: > I have noticed the latest libsnmp15 update, but I have been unable to > install, because this has dependancies on perl >= 5.10 which eventual > leads me to ldap-utils. Which version of libsnmp15 are you trying to install, on which architecture? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI

libsnmp security update

2008-05-27 Thread Alex Samad
Hi I have noticed the latest libsnmp15 update, but I have been unable to install, because this has dependancies on perl >= 5.10 which eventual leads me to ldap-utils. ldap-utils version 2.3.38-1+lenny1 is the last (that I have) version compiled against the openssl libraries, the ones after that a