> But did locales get removed?
as i wrote yesterday _morning_ it work fine. can't say anything during
the day... and all system work fine since than.
bye,
tom.
--
pub 1024D/DB69936B 2002-03-01 Thomas Buhk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = DA11 1EC3 30EE BE59 3D47 9A0E F7E2 9CF1 DB69 9
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:36:01AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> > Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Today's release of 2.2.5-10 appears to have resolved the problem.
> >
> > For unstable perhaps, but not for us folks sticking with test
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 09:36:01AM +0900, Olaf Meeuwissen wrote:
> Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Today's release of 2.2.5-10 appears to have resolved the problem.
>
> For unstable perhaps, but not for us folks sticking with testing.
I am running woody and it showed up and it show
Olaf Meeuwissen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On a side note, I get this:
>
> # /usr/bin/apt-get -d upgrade
> Readin Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following packages will be upgraded
> glibc-doc libc6
> 2 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to re
Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Today's release of 2.2.5-10 appears to have resolved the problem.
For unstable perhaps, but not for us folks sticking with testing.
On a side note, I get this:
# /usr/bin/apt-get -d upgrade
Readin Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree...
Today's release of 2.2.5-10 appears to have resolved the problem.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had this problem today, i installed the missing .deb files manually
(packages.debian.org)
Cheers,
Annette
---
Cablecom GmbH
Security Team
Zollstrasse 42
CH-8021 Zürich
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 05:55:17PM +0200, Thomas Buhk wrote:
> > locales because the glibc_2.2.5-9.woody.4.deb would be
> > missing. I had a
>
> hm... no problem this morning on several systems, all work fine with
> 'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade'
But did locales get removed?
There is no gl
> locales because the glibc_2.2.5-9.woody.4.deb would be
> missing. I had a
hm... no problem this morning on several systems, all work fine with
'apt-get update; apt-get upgrade'
bye,
tom.
--
pub 1024D/DB69936B 2002-03-01 Thomas Buhk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = DA11 1EC3 30EE
Hi
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:58:41 +0300
Marcel Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Perhaps I am the only one to have this problem. Today I tried to apt
> upgrade one of my servers. But dselect insisted to deinstall j2sdk and
> locales because the glibc_2.2.5-9.woody.4.deb would be missin
Marcel Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looks like a bug to me...
Yes, it's bug #153445. glibc/locales have had a lot of problems like
this recently. It'll probably be fixed as soon as the security team
can get things recompiled.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 16:58, Marcel Weber wrote:
> Hi
>
> Perhaps I am the only one to have this problem. Today I tried to apt
> upgrade one of my servers. But dselect insisted to deinstall j2sdk and
> locales because the glibc_2.2.5-9.woody.4.deb would be missing. I had a
> look at the ftp://
Hi
Perhaps I am the only one to have this problem. Today I tried to apt
upgrade one of my servers. But dselect insisted to deinstall j2sdk and
locales because the glibc_2.2.5-9.woody.4.deb would be missing. I had a
look at the ftp://security.debian.org/ server and it was missing indeed.
Loo
13 matches
Mail list logo
