On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >i was talking about "i dont know why it is default to use unsecure crypt()
> >instead of md5".
> >But I can think of something like "compatibility" (to what?) :)
>
> to ...maybe NIS ?
I use NIS with md5, no compatibility problems at all as long as all
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >i was talking about "i dont know why it is default to use unsecure crypt() instead
> >of md5".
> >But I can think of something like "compatibility" (to what?) :)
>
> to ...maybe NIS ?
I use NIS with md5, no compatibility problems at all as long as all
On Sunday, 2003-12-07 at 00:58:59 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >Can't be NIS. NIS will transport any password style faithfully. Of
> >course the master server must support MD5 passwords if you change your
> >password and the passwd command sends an MD5 password to the
> >yppasswordd.
> I've hea
On Sunday, 2003-12-07 at 00:58:59 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >Can't be NIS. NIS will transport any password style faithfully. Of
> >course the master server must support MD5 passwords if you change your
> >password and the passwd command sends an MD5 password to the
> >yppasswordd.
> I've hea
Hi,
>Can't be NIS. NIS will transport any password style faithfully. Of
>course the master server must support MD5 passwords if you change your
>password and the passwd command sends an MD5 password to the
>yppasswordd.
I've heard about non-Linux NIS client (for example, solaris8 and
SFU - Win
Hi,
>Can't be NIS. NIS will transport any password style faithfully. Of
>course the master server must support MD5 passwords if you change your
>password and the passwd command sends an MD5 password to the
>yppasswordd.
I've heard about non-Linux NIS client (for example, solaris8 and
SFU - Win
On Saturday, 2003-12-06 at 17:03:02 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >i was talking about "i dont know why it is default to use unsecure crypt()
> >instead of md5".
> >But I can think of something like "compatibility" (to what?) :)
> to ...maybe NIS ?
> # if the reason why using crypt is NIS com
On Friday, 2003-12-05 at 20:39:16 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >> Dont know why and for which debian versions it is default, I have some
> >> mixed
> >> ones.
> > Why? Because it uses DES and DES uses 56 bit keys. Eight 7 bit chars
> > give you exact
Hi,
>i was talking about "i dont know why it is default to use unsecure crypt()
>instead of md5".
>But I can think of something like "compatibility" (to what?) :)
to ...maybe NIS ?
# if the reason why using crypt is NIS compatibility, people
who uses NIS system is not so many, so I think i
On Saturday, 2003-12-06 at 17:03:02 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> >i was talking about "i dont know why it is default to use unsecure crypt() instead
> >of md5".
> >But I can think of something like "compatibility" (to what?) :)
> to ...maybe NIS ?
> # if the reason why using crypt is NIS com
On Friday, 2003-12-05 at 20:39:16 +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> >> Dont know why and for which debian versions it is default, I have some mixed
> >> ones.
> > Why? Because it uses DES and DES uses 56 bit keys. Eight 7 bit chars
> > give you exactly 56
Hi,
>i was talking about "i dont know why it is default to use unsecure crypt() instead of
>md5".
>But I can think of something like "compatibility" (to what?) :)
to ...maybe NIS ?
# if the reason why using crypt is NIS compatibility, people
who uses NIS system is not so many, so I think i
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> Dont know why and for which debian versions it is default, I have some mixed
>> ones.
>
> Why? Because it uses DES and DES uses 56 bit keys. Eight 7 bit chars
> give you exactly 56 bits...
*lol*
i was talking about "i dont know why it is default to us
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> Dont know why and for which debian versions it is default, I have some mixed
>> ones.
>
> Why? Because it uses DES and DES uses 56 bit keys. Eight 7 bit chars
> give you exactly 56 bits...
*lol*
i was talking about "i dont know why it is default to us
Quoting Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> > characters of the passwd.
> Dont know why and for which debian versions it is default, I have some mixed
> ones.
Why? Because it us
Quoting Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> > characters of the passwd.
> Dont know why and for which debian versions it is default, I have some mixed
> ones.
Why? Because it us
- Original Message -
From: "Ruben Porras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: extrange passwd behaviour
El jue, 04-12-2003 a las 22:05, Kevin escribió:
> > I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of th
- Original Message -
From: "Ruben Porras" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 12:21 AM
Subject: Re: extrange passwd behaviour
El jue, 04-12-2003 a las 22:05, Kevin escribiÃ:
> > I've discovered that login, sudo,
El jue, 04-12-2003 a las 22:05, Kevin escribió:
> > I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> > characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> > following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
>
> If you are not using md5 pas
El jue, 04-12-2003 a las 22:08, Greg Folkert escribió:
> On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:12, Ruben Porras wrote:
> > I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> > characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> > following example (I've created a new use
El jue, 04-12-2003 a las 22:05, Kevin escribiÃ:
> > I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> > characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> > following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
>
> If you are not using md5 pas
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> characters of the passwd.
this is the default unix behaviour. What settings do you have in pam?
Especially do you use md5 passwords?
Dont know why and for which debian versions it is
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:12:22PM +0100, Ruben Porras wrote:
> I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
This is how the "standar
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:12, Ruben Porras wrote:
> I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
>
> $$ adduser test
> Adding user tes
> I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
If you are not using md5 passwords will have a max length of 8
characters. If you're
El jue, 04-12-2003 a las 22:08, Greg Folkert escribiÃ:
> On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:12, Ruben Porras wrote:
> > I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> > characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> > following example (I've created a new use
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> characters of the passwd.
this is the default unix behaviour. What settings do you have in pam?
Especially do you use md5 passwords?
Dont know why and for which debian versions it is
I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
$$ adduser test
Adding user test...
Adding new group test (1006).
Adding new user test (1006
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:12:22PM +0100, Ruben Porras wrote:
> I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
This is how the "standar
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 15:12, Ruben Porras wrote:
> I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
>
> $$ adduser test
> Adding user tes
> I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
> characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
> following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
If you are not using md5 passwords will have a max length of 8
characters. If you're
I've discovered that login, sudo, gdm only take care of the first 8
characters of the passwd. The following characters don't count. See the
following example (I've created a new user just to make the test)
$$ adduser test
Adding user test...
Adding new group test (1006).
Adding new user test (1006
32 matches
Mail list logo
