On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 01:12:02AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Shouldn't the security team have a gpg key available so confidential
> messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] can be sent encrypted?
Shouldn't you read the security team FAQ?
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#contact
--
- mdz
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 01:12:02AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Shouldn't the security team have a gpg key available so confidential
> messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] can be sent encrypted?
Shouldn't you read the security team FAQ?
http://www.debian.org/security/faq#contact
--
- mdz
--
To U
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 01:12:02AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Shouldn't the security team have a gpg key available so confidential
> messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] can be sent encrypted?
>
That's probably why the Debian Security Team FAQ says:
[from http://www.debian.org/security/faq]
Q: How
Shouldn't the security team have a gpg key available so confidential
messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] can be sent encrypted?
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
"Text is a way we cheat time." -- Patrick Nielsen Hayden
On Sat, Jun 21, 2003 at 01:12:02AM -0700, Blars Blarson wrote:
> Shouldn't the security team have a gpg key available so confidential
> messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] can be sent encrypted?
>
That's probably why the Debian Security Team FAQ says:
[from http://www.debian.org/security/faq]
Q: How
Shouldn't the security team have a gpg key available so confidential
messages to [EMAIL PROTECTED] can be sent encrypted?
--
Blars Blarson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.blars.org/blars.html
"Text is a way we cheat time." -- Patrick Nielsen Hayden
6 matches
Mail list logo