On Tuesday 13 February 2007 16:48:10 martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Felipe Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.02.13.1837 +]:
> > I am currently using 0.6.1-7 from backports, is this the
> > deprecated version you meant?
>
> Yes, but if you go through the trouble of creating the rules,
also sprach Felipe Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.02.13.1837 +]:
> I am currently using 0.6.1-7 from backports, is this the
> deprecated version you meant?
Yes, but if you go through the trouble of creating the rules, it
won't be very hard to migrate. I can help you then.
--
Please do
On Tuesday 13 February 2007 10:48:28 martin f krafft wrote:
> but do try to go with fail2ban from etch, since sarge's configuration is
> deprecated.
Can't do because of a dependecy hell over sarge's 2.4 being old enough.
Etch's fail2ban version is 0.7.5-2 and sarge doesn't even have it.
I am
also sprach Felipe Figueiredo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007.02.13.1238 +]:
> I would like to take further measures and add the offender's ip to
> a blacklist, in a similar way as fail2ban do to ssh, i.e., block
> access from it temporarily.
You can use fail2ban for this. Once you created the rules
Hello,
I get, on an almost daily basis, attempts of use of my mail server as a relay.
Since it (postfix) only accepts relay from authenticated clients (or from
local), these attempts are usually logged and denied.
I would like to take further measures and add the offender's ip to a
blacklist,
5 matches
Mail list logo
