> do you use a proxy with lynx, if so you may need to use one with apt!
Ah.. that got asked before privately; I should have posted a reply to
the list. No, there's no proxy needed.
KEN
do you use a proxy with lynx, if so you may need to use one with apt!
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 09:09:52AM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > is ftp2.sourceforge.net a debian mirror?
>
> I got it off the mirrors list, and it looked like everything was sensible
> from checking with lynx.
>
> > deb
> do you use a proxy with lynx, if so you may need to use one with apt!
Ah.. that got asked before privately; I should have posted a reply to
the list. No, there's no proxy needed.
KEN
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PRO
do you use a proxy with lynx, if so you may need to use one with apt!
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 09:09:52AM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> > is ftp2.sourceforge.net a debian mirror?
>
> I got it off the mirrors list, and it looked like everything was sensible
> from checking with lynx.
>
> > de
> is ftp2.sourceforge.net a debian mirror?
I got it off the mirrors list, and it looked like everything was sensible
from checking with lynx.
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
> and an "apt-get update"
> what´s the exact output?
First, note that 'lynx http://ft
> is ftp2.sourceforge.net a debian mirror?
I got it off the mirrors list, and it looked like everything was sensible
from checking with lynx.
> deb http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ testing main non-free contrib
> and an "apt-get update"
> what´s the exact output?
First, note that 'lynx http://f
Am 13.08.2001 20:01 Uhr schrieb Kenneth Pronovici unter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Ok... nothing at all in /var/log about this (as far as I can tell).
>
> I cannot apt to a different server. I tried "ftp2.sourceforge.net" - which
> I can use lynx to connect to - but I get similar apt errors.
>
> Rei
Am 13.08.2001 20:01 Uhr schrieb Kenneth Pronovici unter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Ok... nothing at all in /var/log about this (as far as I can tell).
>
> I cannot apt to a different server. I tried "ftp2.sourceforge.net" - which
> I can use lynx to connect to - but I get similar apt errors.
>
> Re
> Hmm...
>
> Any logs about? /var/log/syslog? /var/log/messages?
> are you able to "apt" another server? Is your apt installation fine or is
> any file missing?
> Try to fetch the aptdeb, purge your existing apt ("dpkg --force-depends
> --purge apt), and reinstall it, to assure no file´s missi
> Hmm...
>
> Any logs about? /var/log/syslog? /var/log/messages?
> are you able to "apt" another server? Is your apt installation fine or is
> any file missing?
> Try to fetch the aptdeb, purge your existing apt ("dpkg --force-depends
> --purge apt), and reinstall it, to assure no file´s miss
Am 13.08.2001 18:02 Uhr schrieb Kenneth Pronovici unter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> do you use any kind of firewall? In the network or local? Eventually a
>> configuration mistake in netfilterIs your specific machine allowed to
>> connect to debian.org?
>> can you ping 132.229.131.40? ping security.debi
> do you use any kind of firewall? In the network or local? Eventually a
> configuration mistake in netfilterIs your specific machine allowed to
> connect to debian.org?
> can you ping 132.229.131.40? ping security.debian.org?
> What does telnet security.debian.org 80 say?
Yes, I'm using a firewal
Am 13.08.2001 17:25 Uhr schrieb Kenneth Pronovici unter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>> Err http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages
>>> Could not connect to security.debian.org (132.229.131.40).
>>>
>>
>> My guess is that this was a temporary server or network
>> outage. I just did an ap
> >Err http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages
> > Could not connect to security.debian.org (132.229.131.40).
> >
>
>My guess is that this was a temporary server or network
>outage. I just did an apt-get update with this same source.
>It hung and 99% the first
Am 13.08.2001 18:02 Uhr schrieb Kenneth Pronovici unter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> do you use any kind of firewall? In the network or local? Eventually a
>> configuration mistake in netfilterIs your specific machine allowed to
>> connect to debian.org?
>> can you ping 132.229.131.40? ping security.deb
> do you use any kind of firewall? In the network or local? Eventually a
> configuration mistake in netfilterIs your specific machine allowed to
> connect to debian.org?
> can you ping 132.229.131.40? ping security.debian.org?
> What does telnet security.debian.org 80 say?
Yes, I'm using a firewa
Am 13.08.2001 17:25 Uhr schrieb Kenneth Pronovici unter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>> Err http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages
>>> Could not connect to security.debian.org (132.229.131.40).
>>>
>>
>> My guess is that this was a temporary server or network
>> outage. I just did an a
> >Err http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages
> > Could not connect to security.debian.org (132.229.131.40).
> >
>
>My guess is that this was a temporary server or network
>outage. I just did an apt-get update with this same source.
>It hung and 99% the first
Kenneth Pronovici, 2001-Aug-12 21:49 -0500:
>Err http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages
> Could not connect to security.debian.org (132.229.131.40).
>
My guess is that this was a temporary server or network
outage. I just did an apt-get update with this same sourc
I had a similar question in regard to where partidcular packages which
have security patches should be downloaded from - the obvious question
is the security server, however it doesn't seem to work that way all the
time ...
I don't have my sources.list at hand, unfortunately, but I have noticed
th
I'm cross-posting this to user and security, because there are really two
(possibly-related) issues here. Feel free to take replies to just one list
or the other.
On my firewall (running potato), I have been using these apt sources.list
entries:
deb http://security.debian.org potato/updates
Kenneth Pronovici, 2001-Aug-12 21:49 -0500:
>Err http://security.debian.org potato/updates/main Packages
> Could not connect to security.debian.org (132.229.131.40).
>
My guess is that this was a temporary server or network
outage. I just did an apt-get update with this same sour
I had a similar question in regard to where partidcular packages which
have security patches should be downloaded from - the obvious question
is the security server, however it doesn't seem to work that way all the
time ...
I don't have my sources.list at hand, unfortunately, but I have noticed
t
I'm cross-posting this to user and security, because there are really two
(possibly-related) issues here. Feel free to take replies to just one list
or the other.
On my firewall (running potato), I have been using these apt sources.list
entries:
deb http://security.debian.org potato/updates
24 matches
Mail list logo
