Re: any DSA for CAN-2004-0930

2004-11-18 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi Rolf, "Wed, 17 Nov 2004 11:35:01 +0100", "Rolf Kutz" "Re: any DSA for CAN-2004-0930" >> How about CAN-2004-0600 and CAN-2004-0686 for samba in stable? > >There is no Samba3 in stable. OK, I know that, stable version is Samba 2.2.3a based on

Re: any DSA for CAN-2004-0930

2004-11-17 Thread Rolf Kutz
* Quoting Hideki Yamane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >It has been fixed for unstable at least. > > How about CAN-2004-0600 and CAN-2004-0686 for samba in stable? There is no Samba3 in stable. - Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E

Re: any DSA for CAN-2004-0930

2004-11-17 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, "Wed, 17 Nov 2004 00:11:34 -0500", "Stephen Gran" "Re: any DSA for CAN-2004-0930" >samba (3.0.8-1) unstable; urgency=high > > * New upstream package. Urgency set to "high" because of a potential >Denial of Service vulnerability in

Re: any DSA for CAN-2004-0930

2004-11-16 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Joey Hess said: > Geoff Crompton wrote: > > Has there been any DSA released for CAN-2004-0930, an Input > > Vulnerability in Samba, 3.0 to 3.0.7. > > Nope, there has not. However: samba (3.0.8-1) unstable; urgency=high * New upstream package. Urgency set to "high

Re: any DSA for CAN-2004-0930

2004-11-16 Thread Joey Hess
Geoff Crompton wrote: > Has there been any DSA released for CAN-2004-0930, an Input > Vulnerability in Samba, 3.0 to 3.0.7. Nope, there has not. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

any DSA for CAN-2004-0930

2004-11-16 Thread Geoff Crompton
Hi, Has there been any DSA released for CAN-2004-0930, an Input Vulnerability in Samba, 3.0 to 3.0.7. Ta -- Geoff Crompton Debian System Administrator StrategicData +61-3-9348-2013 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]