On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:02:58PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:59:44AM -0500, David wrote:
> > In an attempt to learn more about the workings of gpg, I've been trying
> > to verify emails from the command line.
> >
> > When I try to verify a saved message - one whi
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:02:58PM +0100, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:59:44AM -0500, David wrote:
> > In an attempt to learn more about the workings of gpg, I've been trying
> > to verify emails from the command line.
> >
> > When I try to verify a saved message - one whi
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:59:44AM -0500, David wrote:
> In an attempt to learn more about the workings of gpg, I've been trying
> to verify emails from the command line.
>
> These signatures are not signed, but mutt reports a good signature, but,
> of course, warning that they are not signed..
>
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:59:44AM -0500, David wrote:
> In an attempt to learn more about the workings of gpg, I've been trying
> to verify emails from the command line.
>
> These signatures are not signed, but mutt reports a good signature, but,
> of course, warning that they are not signed..
>
In an attempt to learn more about the workings of gpg, I've been trying
to verify emails from the command line.
These signatures are not signed, but mutt reports a good signature, but,
of course, warning that they are not signed..
When I try to verify a saved message - one which has been reported
In an attempt to learn more about the workings of gpg, I've been trying
to verify emails from the command line.
These signatures are not signed, but mutt reports a good signature, but,
of course, warning that they are not signed..
When I try to verify a saved message - one which has been reporte
6 matches
Mail list logo