Re: Strange email from debian list

2003-09-01 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 01 September 2003 22:42, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Frans Pop wrote: > > Can anyone explain why the mail below was bounced(?) by murphy.debian.org > > to me? > > I did not send the original mail, I am not listed anywhere in the > > original mail and I am not subscribed to

Re: Strange email from debian list

2003-09-01 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Frans Pop wrote: > Can anyone explain why the mail below was bounced(?) by murphy.debian.org to > me? > I did not send the original mail, I am not listed anywhere in the original > mail and I am not subscribed to debian-i386-changes (nor have been in the > past). > > Thnx. > >

Strange email from debian list

2003-09-01 Thread Frans Pop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Can anyone explain why the mail below was bounced(?) by murphy.debian.org to me? I did not send the original mail, I am not listed anywhere in the original mail and I am not subscribed to debian-i386-changes (nor have been in the past). Th

Re: Strange email from debian list

2003-09-01 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 01 September 2003 22:42, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Frans Pop wrote: > > Can anyone explain why the mail below was bounced(?) by murphy.debian.org > > to me? > > I did not send the original mail, I am not listed anywhere in the > > original mail and I am not subscribed to

Re: Strange email from debian list

2003-09-01 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Frans Pop wrote: > Can anyone explain why the mail below was bounced(?) by murphy.debian.org to > me? > I did not send the original mail, I am not listed anywhere in the original > mail and I am not subscribed to debian-i386-changes (nor have been in the > past). > > Thnx. > >

Strange email from debian list

2003-09-01 Thread Frans Pop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Can anyone explain why the mail below was bounced(?) by murphy.debian.org to me? I did not send the original mail, I am not listed anywhere in the original mail and I am not subscribed to debian-i386-changes (nor have been in the past). Th