On lun., 2011-01-03 at 16:24 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Also, it would be useful to try to start adopting some of the additional
> features applied in Ubuntu [1] but not in Debian. The hardest part
> there is going to be convincing the gcc maintainers to deviate from
> upstream defaults.
No
On Mon, 03 Jan 2011 15:05:43 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2010-12-21 at 22:52 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Starting january, I think I'll be able to dedicate some time to debian
> > security team.
>
> Ok, so we're now at beginning of january :)
>
> Is there any starting speci
On Monday 03 January 2011, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> On mar., 2010-12-21 at 22:52 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Starting january, I think I'll be able to dedicate some time to
> > debian security team.
Very nice.
> Ok, so we're now at beginning of january :)
>
> Is there any starting spec
On mar., 2010-12-21 at 22:52 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Starting january, I think I'll be able to dedicate some time to debian
> security team.
Ok, so we're now at beginning of january :)
Is there any starting specific point on which help/time would be needed?
I know a “call for help” is s
On mar., 2010-12-21 at 22:52 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> Starting january, I think I'll be able to dedicate some time to debian
> security team.
Ok, so we're now at beginning of january :)
Is there any starting specific point on which help/time would be needed?
I know a “call for help” is s
5 matches
Mail list logo