On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 18:29, Albert Cervera Areny wrote:
> I've read in slashdot
> (http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/02/2035207) that openbsd has
> included stack-smashing protection using the ProPolice
> (http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/) patch for GCC
On Fri, 2002-12-06 at 18:29, Albert Cervera Areny wrote:
> I've read in slashdot
> (http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/02/2035207) that openbsd has
> included stack-smashing protection using the ProPolice
> (http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/) patch for GCC
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.2129 +0100]:
> > I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as soon
> > as
> > gcc becomes the compiler by default. Protecting the entire system from this
> >
also sprach Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.2129 +0100]:
> I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as soon as
> gcc becomes the compiler by default. Protecting the entire system from this
> kind of bugs would really be a great security step forward.
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.2129 +0100]:
> > I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as soon as
> > gcc becomes the compiler by default. Protecting the entire system from this
> > kind
also sprach Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.2129 +0100]:
> I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as soon as
> gcc becomes the compiler by default. Protecting the entire system from this
> kind of bugs would really be a great security step forward.
A Saturday 07 December 2002 2:37, David B Harris va escriure:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:09:59 +0100
>
> Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So it isn't really that the hole system runs 8% slower. Sorry for my
> > first explanation... Now I think it is an overhead which is afordable
>
A Saturday 07 December 2002 2:37, David B Harris va escriure:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:09:59 +0100
>
> Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So it isn't really that the hole system runs 8% slower. Sorry for my
> > first explanation... Now I think it is an overhead which is afordable
>
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:09:59 +0100
Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it isn't really that the hole system runs 8% slower. Sorry for my
> first explanation... Now I think it is an overhead which is afordable
> seeing its benefits.
For your purposes, anyways.
As has been said, thi
s.
>
> regards
>
> Thing
>
> On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 09:29, Albert Cervera Areny wrote:
> > I've read in slashdot
> > (http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/02/2035207) that openbsd
> > has included stack-smashing protection using the ProPolice
> > (
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 01:09:59 +0100
Albert Cervera Areny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So it isn't really that the hole system runs 8% slower. Sorry for my
> first explanation... Now I think it is an overhead which is afordable
> seeing its benefits.
For your purposes, anyways.
As has been said, thi
s.
>
> regards
>
> Thing
>
> On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 09:29, Albert Cervera Areny wrote:
> > I've read in slashdot
> > (http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/02/2035207) that openbsd
> > has included stack-smashing protection using the ProPolice
> > (
Lets see some papers/justification for this item, it may not be needed in all
situations.
regards
Thing
On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 09:29, Albert Cervera Areny wrote:
> I've read in slashdot
> (http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/02/2035207) that openbsd has
> included stack-
I've read in slashdot
(http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/02/2035207) that openbsd has
included stack-smashing protection using the ProPolice
(http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/) patch for GCC 3.2
I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as
Lets see some papers/justification for this item, it may not be needed in all
situations.
regards
Thing
On Sat, 07 Dec 2002 09:29, Albert Cervera Areny wrote:
> I've read in slashdot
> (http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/02/2035207) that openbsd has
> included stack-
I've read in slashdot
(http://bsd.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/12/02/2035207) that openbsd has
included stack-smashing protection using the ProPolice
(http://www.trl.ibm.com/projects/security/ssp/) patch for GCC 3.2
I think it would be a great idea to use this patch with debian too as
16 matches
Mail list logo
