Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-09-03 Thread Christoph Haas
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 06:33:07AM -0400, Snyder, Dave (D.F.) wrote: > Is Linux vulnerable to these unwanted downloads and if so, how do I protect > Linux so I don't have a similar issue? In theory, yes. Surfing security depends mainly on your web browser. However generally security standards on L

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-09-03 Thread Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:42:49PM +0200, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 13.30, Volker Tanger wrote: > > [spyware/adware/trojans/...:] > > Another thing that protects Linux systems: heterogenity. Binary exploits > usual

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-09-01 Thread Jaroslaw Tabor
Hello Dave! As I see there is a lot of very deep answers, regarding issue. But from regular user point of view, there is NO COMPARISION between windoze and Linux in area of security. I'm working with Linux since 1994, for last 3-4 years I'm working ONLY with Linux (Debian unstable). I thin

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-09-01 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Wednesday 01 September 2004 12.06, Duncan Simpson wrote: > BTW binaries are pretty portable across linux systems. I had some libc > 4.x (a.out) binaries on my older box from SLS 1.03 (kernel 0.99pl13) at > least until the 1.2.x kernels. I don't know exactly why you mention this here, but as th

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-09-01 Thread Duncan Simpson
Nobody has brought this up, so I guess it up to me to do so. A lot of windows {ad,spy,mal}ware does *not* require you to click on anything or explicilty install anything. All you need to do is visit the "right" web page or preview an appropriate HTML email. ActiveX and IE security flaws do the rest

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 1 Sep 2004, s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from Daniel Pittman: >> >> *Most* mail clients under Unix are better written than to do that, but > > Even mutt (a terrific MUA) _can be told_ to automatically "handle" > MIME types for you, if you want. It just depends what's in your > /.mailcap, and th

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Daniel Pittman: > > *Most* mail clients under Unix are better written than to do that, but Even mutt (a terrific MUA) _can be told_ to automatically "handle" MIME types for you, if you want. It just depends what's in your ~/.mailcap, and that can contain any sort of command you can

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Daniel Pittman
On 1 Sep 2004, Jim Richardson wrote: > On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:50:09 +0200, > Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tuesday 31 August 2004 13.30, Volker Tanger wrote: >> >> [spyware/adware/trojans/...:] >> >>>

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Jim Richardson
r-Encoding: quoted-printable > Content-Disposition: inline > > On Tuesday 31 August 2004 13.30, Volker Tanger wrote: > > [spyware/adware/trojans/...:] > >> Yes and no. When surfing as normal user *ware programs cannot install >> themselves as system services or overwrite progra

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Manfred Schmitt
Davide Prina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Under GNU/Linux I never see a program with some Adware/Spyware, all > program I have see are free software, but all come with source so it is > very hard to hide a SpyWare or an Adware. > > So I think that GNU/Linux is free of this type of pests if yo

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 13.30, Volker Tanger wrote: [spyware/adware/trojans/...:] > Yes and no. When surfing as normal user *ware programs cannot install > themselves as system services or overwrite programs simply as you/they > do not have the (file) permissions to do so. Technic

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Edward Faulkner
I have been using Linux continuously for 4 years and have never once been infected with a virus, trojan, or adware. It simply doesn't happen. However, I have seen unmaintained machines get hacked. Like any software, you need to stay current to stay safe. Debian has an excellent security record,

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Davide Prina
Snyder, Dave (D.F.) wrote: Security, I just purchased Debian Linux for my home PC and waiting for the CD's to arrive this week. I'm looking forward to installing so I can eventually divorce myself from Microsoft Windows. I've had more calls in the last few weeks from friends and relatives rega

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Sels, Roger
Furthermore, it all depends on your (download) sources. If you install from Debian packages, you should have the implied guarantee that these don't contain backdoors or virii. Of course, if you download some unknown program from a website, apply someone's patches or make any other modifications wi

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Volker Tanger
Greetings! On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:17:22 +0200 (MEST) "Martin Fries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I´m not an expert. Just a normal user. But I think Linux is vulnerable > like any other OS. Yes and no. When surfing as normal user *ware programs cannot install themselves as system services or overw

Re: Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Martin Fries
I´m not an expert. Just a normal user. But I think Linux is vulnerable like any other OS. But at this time the risk is not as high as under Windows. In my opinion it depends on how many people are using one specific OS or browser. At home I´ve installed both Windows and Linux. And if you configure

Spyware / Adware

2004-08-31 Thread Snyder, Dave (D.F.)
Title: Spyware / Adware Security, I just purchased Debian Linux for my home PC and waiting for the CD's to arrive this week.  I'm looking forward to installing so I can eventually divorce myself from Microsoft Windows. I've had more calls in the last few weeks from friend