Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
"L. Besselink" wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, monte wrote: > > > Hi: > >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. > > We > > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > > time with Linux. > > Probably because it's a more stabl

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
monte wrote: >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > time > with Linux. I guess you smell Linux money. Interesting troll. Windows sucks, so I used OS/2. MS forked (hmm) OS/2

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
"L. Besselink" wrote: > > On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, monte wrote: > > > Hi: > >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > > time with Linux. > > Probably because it's a more stable se

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
monte wrote: >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste time > with Linux. I guess you smell Linux money. Interesting troll. Windows sucks, so I used OS/2. MS forked (hmm) OS/2 a

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread L. Besselink
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, monte wrote: > Hi: >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > time with Linux. Probably because it's a more stable server platform and that's where he keeps al

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread L. Besselink
On Tue, 4 Jul 2000, monte wrote: > Hi: >You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We > couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste > time with Linux. Probably because it's a more stable server platform and that's where he keeps a

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-04 Thread monte
Hi: You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste time with Linux. I guess you smell Linux money. "Christopher W. Curtis" wrote: > Martin Bogomolni wrote: > > > > Okay, I think the s/n ra

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-03 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
Alexander Hvostov wrote: > Christopher, > If you have access to WinNT source, you must be of some importance to > Micro$oft (or perhaps they are to you), so why are you on this mailing > list? I am, I think, the only person at work who is not a PhD. One of my coworkers (http://www.aet-usa.com/aa

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-03 Thread monte
Hi: You make a living with MS platform, that is fine for you and all of us. We couldn't care less about that, only are somewhat curious about why you waste time with Linux. I guess you smell Linux money. "Christopher W. Curtis" wrote: > Martin Bogomolni wrote: > > > > Okay, I think the s/n ra

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-03 Thread Alexander Hvostov
Christopher, If you have access to WinNT source, you must be of some importance to Micro$oft (or perhaps they are to you), so why are you on this mailing list? Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version:

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-03 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
Martin Bogomolni wrote: > > Okay, I think the s/n ratio is just getting to be a bit low. :| > > The consensus seems to be "Not a security issue we want to deal > with." If true, then as any responsible Linux user, it shall be that the use of Debian is actively discouraged for not only not fixing

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-03 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
Alexander Hvostov wrote: > Christopher, > If you have access to WinNT source, you must be of some importance to > Micro$oft (or perhaps they are to you), so why are you on this mailing > list? I am, I think, the only person at work who is not a PhD. One of my coworkers (http://www.aet-usa.com/a

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-03 Thread Alexander Hvostov
Christopher, If you have access to WinNT source, you must be of some importance to Micro$oft (or perhaps they are to you), so why are you on this mailing list? Regards, Alex. --- PGP/GPG Fingerprint: EFD1 AC6C 7ED5 E453 C367 AC7A B474 16E0 758D 7ED9 -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version:

Re: Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-03 Thread Christopher W. Curtis
Martin Bogomolni wrote: > > Okay, I think the s/n ratio is just getting to be a bit low. :| > > The consensus seems to be "Not a security issue we want to deal > with." If true, then as any responsible Linux user, it shall be that the use of Debian is actively discouraged for not only not fixin

Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-03 Thread Martin Bogomolni
Okay, I think the s/n ratio is just getting to be a bit low. :| The consensus seems to be "Not a security issue we want to deal with." Martin

Sheesh .. talk about beating a dead horse (autofs)

2000-07-03 Thread Martin Bogomolni
Okay, I think the s/n ratio is just getting to be a bit low. :| The consensus seems to be "Not a security issue we want to deal with." Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC