On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:29:22 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >> > I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
> >> > build-essential and debhelper to do it.
> >>
> >> Ok guy, but apt pin is so
NOKUBI Takatsugu (Thursday 28 March 2002 19:29):
| In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| >> > I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
| >> > build-essential and debhelper to do it.
| >>
| >> Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
|
| However it requires
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002 18:29:22 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> >> > I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
> >> > build-essential and debhelper to do it.
> >>
> >> Ok guy, but apt pin is so
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> > I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
>> > build-essential and debhelper to do it.
>>
>> Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
However it requires new libc6. I dislike it so I tried to build on
potato. It's jus
NOKUBI Takatsugu (Thursday 28 March 2002 19:29):
| In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| >> > I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
| >> > build-essential and debhelper to do it.
| >>
| >> Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
|
| However it require
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> > I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
>> > build-essential and debhelper to do it.
>>
>> Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
However it requires new libc6. I dislike it so I tried to build on
potato. It's ju
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:11:58 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
> [...]
> I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
> build-essential and debhelper to do it.
Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
See:
- Add in your sources.list something like:
deb http://http.us.
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:11:58 JST
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOKUBI Takatsugu) wrote:
> [...]
> I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
> build-essential and debhelper to do it.
Ok guy, but apt pin is so easy =)
See:
- Add in your sources.list something like:
deb http://http.us
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> > Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
>>
>> See: http://packages.debian.org/chkrootkit
>>
>> Try apt pin and get chkrootkit from sid.
I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
build-essential and d
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> > Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
>>
>> See: http://packages.debian.org/chkrootkit
>>
>> Try apt pin and get chkrootkit from sid.
I could made potato package easily from sid's source. It requires
build-essential and
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:15:05 +
Simon Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
See: http://packages.debian.org/chkrootkit
Try apt pin and get chkrootkit from sid.
bye,
--
_
Hi Simon,
http://www.chkrootkit.org/ worked fine for me...
Patrick
Simon Young (Tuesday 26 March 2002 17:15):
| Hi,
|
| I have a potato system which, suspiciously, has some lines missing
| from syslog, and possibly from the lastlog too. I know chkrootkit will
| check for this kind of thing, but
Hi,
I have a potato system which, suspiciously, has some lines missing
from syslog, and possibly from the lastlog too. I know chkrootkit will
check for this kind of thing, but it requires a later version of
libc6.
Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
Many thanks in advance,
Simon.
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002 16:15:05 +
Simon Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [...]
> Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
See: http://packages.debian.org/chkrootkit
Try apt pin and get chkrootkit from sid.
bye,
--
_
Hi Simon,
http://www.chkrootkit.org/ worked fine for me...
Patrick
Simon Young (Tuesday 26 March 2002 17:15):
| Hi,
|
| I have a potato system which, suspiciously, has some lines missing
| from syslog, and possibly from the lastlog too. I know chkrootkit will
| check for this kind of thing, but
Hi,
I have a potato system which, suspiciously, has some lines missing
from syslog, and possibly from the lastlog too. I know chkrootkit will
check for this kind of thing, but it requires a later version of
libc6.
Is there any way of detecting rootkits on potato?
Many thanks in advance,
Simon
He might have meant that he doesn't want to run the risk of getting
a poor utility thinking that it is a good one(risk of security by ignorance),
so he's asking for recommendations from people that might know something.
However, he should understand program/technology limitations (e.g. they mig
He might have meant that he doesn't want to run the risk of getting
a poor utility thinking that it is a good one(risk of security by ignorance),
so he's asking for recommendations from people that might know something.
However, he should understand program/technology limitations (e.g. they mi
"good enough" of a firewall if you don't want any risks
have fun
alvin
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Tracking/ - rootkit checking stuff
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> hey ppl!
> I just wanted to ask if someone can recommend a rootkit
> detectio
"good enough" of a firewall if you don't want any risks
have fun
alvin
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Tracking/ - rootkit checking stuff
On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> hey ppl!
> I just wanted to ask if someone can recommend a rootkit
> detectio
## [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I just wanted to ask if someone can recommend a rootkit
> detection/removal utility. There are a bunch of them if you
> look around but I don't want to run any risk :-)
> would be kind if someone knew of a serious solution :-)
Hello,
chkrootkit is pretty good. You can get it at
http://www.chkrootkit.org/.
Thanks,
Adam
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 01:07:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> hey ppl!
> I just wanted to ask if someone can recommend a rootkit
> detection/removal utility. There
hey ppl!
I just wanted to ask if someone can recommend a rootkit
detection/removal utility. There are a bunch of them if you
look around but I don't want to run any risk :-)
would be kind if someone knew of a serious solution :-)
best regards
Roman Sommer
## [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I just wanted to ask if someone can recommend a rootkit
> detection/removal utility. There are a bunch of them if you
> look around but I don't want to run any risk :-)
> would be kind if someone knew of a serious solution :-)
Hello,
chkrootkit is pretty good. You can get it at
http://www.chkrootkit.org/.
Thanks,
Adam
On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 01:07:47PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> hey ppl!
> I just wanted to ask if someone can recommend a rootkit
> detection/removal utility. There
hey ppl!
I just wanted to ask if someone can recommend a rootkit
detection/removal utility. There are a bunch of them if you
look around but I don't want to run any risk :-)
would be kind if someone knew of a serious solution :-)
best regards
Roman Sommer
--
To UNSUBS
26 matches
Mail list logo
