Re: Re[2]: VPN e Win32 client info

2003-02-12 Thread Fionn Cleary
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 01:47:16PM +0100, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > ontent-Length: 786 > Lines: 20 > > On 12 Feb 2003 at 13:17, Benjamin wrote: > > > is L2TP also possible with dynamic ips? > > Yes it is. Basically you would use an IPsec-encrypted connection with > X509-certs. Have a look at the

Re: Re[2]: VPN e Win32 client info

2003-02-12 Thread Stefan Neufeind
On 12 Feb 2003 at 13:17, Benjamin wrote: > is L2TP also possible with dynamic ips? Yes it is. Basically you would use an IPsec-encrypted connection with X509-certs. Have a look at the "FreeS/Wan-patch-homepage" and try out the patched FreeS/Wan or maybe already SuperFreeS/Wan with the X509- pat

Re: Re[2]: VPN e Win32 client info

2003-02-12 Thread Fionn Cleary
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 01:47:16PM +0100, Stefan Neufeind wrote: > ontent-Length: 786 > Lines: 20 > > On 12 Feb 2003 at 13:17, Benjamin wrote: > > > is L2TP also possible with dynamic ips? > > Yes it is. Basically you would use an IPsec-encrypted connection with > X509-certs. Have a look at the

Re[2]: VPN e Win32 client info

2003-02-12 Thread Benjamin
hi, is L2TP also possible with dynamic ips? if it is so i would be very interested in getting the links. thanks benjamin Wednesday, February 12, 2003, 12:25:30 PM, you wrote: > On 12 Feb 2003 at 11:52, Tadeusz Knapik wrote: >> 12.02.03 pisze Massimo Villa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> > There's

Re: Re[2]: VPN e Win32 client info

2003-02-12 Thread Stefan Neufeind
On 12 Feb 2003 at 13:17, Benjamin wrote: > is L2TP also possible with dynamic ips? Yes it is. Basically you would use an IPsec-encrypted connection with X509-certs. Have a look at the "FreeS/Wan-patch-homepage" and try out the patched FreeS/Wan or maybe already SuperFreeS/Wan with the X509- pat

Re[2]: VPN e Win32 client info

2003-02-12 Thread Benjamin
hi, is L2TP also possible with dynamic ips? if it is so i would be very interested in getting the links. thanks benjamin Wednesday, February 12, 2003, 12:25:30 PM, you wrote: > On 12 Feb 2003 at 11:52, Tadeusz Knapik wrote: >> 12.02.03 pisze Massimo Villa ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> > There's