Re: VPN performance with tunnelv

Hello, I've resolved my problem moving one of the endpoints on another hardware platform, now the VPN bandiwth is equal to the underlying network bandwith. Thanks for all the pointes and suggestions! Have a nice day, I. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ivo Marino

Re: VPN performance with tunnelv

Hello, I've resolved my problem moving one of the endpoints on another hardware platform, now the VPN bandiwth is equal to the underlying network bandwith. Thanks for all the pointes and suggestions! Have a nice day, I. -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ivo Marino

RE: VPN performance with tunnelv

: Re: VPN performance with tunnelv On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote: > I'm actually considering to switch the VPN from tunnelv to freeswan if > this could increase the network performance. > > Any suggestions or pointers for this kind of problem? All

Re: VPN performance with tunnelv

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote: > I'm actually considering to switch the VPN from tunnelv to freeswan if > this could increase the network performance. > > Any suggestions or pointers for this kind of problem? All I can say is, I'm running a 486 firewall machine with f

RE: VPN performance with tunnelv

: Re: VPN performance with tunnelv On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote: > I'm actually considering to switch the VPN from tunnelv to freeswan if > this could increase the network performance. > > Any suggestions or pointers for this kind of problem? All

Re: VPN performance with tunnelv

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:39:08PM +0100, Ivo Marino wrote: > I'm actually considering to switch the VPN from tunnelv to freeswan if > this could increase the network performance. > > Any suggestions or pointers for this kind of problem? All I can say is, I'm running a 486 firewall machine with f

Re: VPN performance with tunnelv

On Monday, 24 February 2003, at 18:39:08 +0100, Ivo Marino wrote: > Now we've connected to this networks some voice over IP phones which we > would like to use through the VPN, the connection works and is securely > encrypted but network performance is quite low. > What is "low" in this context ?

Re: VPN performance with tunnelv

On Monday, 24 February 2003, at 18:39:08 +0100, Ivo Marino wrote: > Now we've connected to this networks some voice over IP phones which we > would like to use through the VPN, the connection works and is securely > encrypted but network performance is quite low. > What is "low" in this context ?