On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> From
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
I've rewritten that in the CVS version, should be available in the website
soon.
Please review it in a few days.
Regards
Javier
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> From
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
I've rewritten that in the CVS version, should be available in the website
soon.
Please review it in a few days.
Regards
Javier
--
To UNSU
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 09:09:24AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> ... and sometimes people forget to leave urgency at 'high' until the fix is
> really in testing when they upload a new version.
Doesn't make a difference. The testing scripts take into account the
maximum urg
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 09:09:24AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> ... and sometimes people forget to leave urgency at 'high' until the fix is
> really in testing when they upload a new version.
Doesn't make a difference. The testing scripts take into account the
maximum urge
On Saturday 21 February 2004 01.14, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> > Uploads that fix a security hole should have the priority set to high,
> > and this should reduce the transition delay to less than a week [1],
> > shouldn't it?
>
>
On Saturday 21 February 2004 01.14, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> > Uploads that fix a security hole should have the priority set to high,
> > and this should reduce the transition delay to less than a week [1],
> > shouldn't it?
>
>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> From
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
>
> > When a security fix is prepared, packages are prepared for unstable
> > and the patch is back ported to stable (since stable is usually so
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
> From
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/ch9.en.html#s9.1.6
>
> > When a security fix is prepared, packages are prepared for unstable
> > and the patch is back ported to stable (since stable is usually so
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
But this is not always true. Sometimes the DSA reports "For the unstable
distribution (sid) these problems will be fixed soon."
Why this ?
The security team has nothing to do with sid packages. If a fix is ready
when the advi
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Gian Piero Carrubba wrote:
But this is not always true. Sometimes the DSA reports "For the unstable
distribution (sid) these problems will be fixed soon."
Why this ?
The security team has nothing to do with sid packages. If a fix is ready
when the advisory
10 matches
Mail list logo
