On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:32:10PM +, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> But well, if I run unstable and I find a strange problem with such an
> important package, I have to tell the debian community. I think that's
> one of the purpose of that mailing-list : knowing problems coming with the
> packages.
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:32:10PM +, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> But well, if I run unstable and I find a strange problem with such an
> important package, I have to tell the debian community. I think that's
> one of the purpose of that mailing-list : knowing problems coming with the
> packages
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:13:06PM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves?
No, we don't. We hope people running unstable report any problems they run
into, so that information can be used to improve Deb
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 11:13:06PM +0200, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves?
No, we don't. We hope people running unstable report any problems they run
into, so that information can be used to improve De
Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 22:38 schrieb Alexis Sukrieh:
> And the winner is .
>
> > just a guess:
> > What about disabling all "session"-entries except the first in the
> > /etc/pam.d/shh like this:
>
> Marcus !!
>
> Wünderbar ! :)
:-)
> It works when I disable other session entries.
>
Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 22:38 schrieb Alexis Sukrieh:
> And the winner is .
>
> > just a guess:
> > What about disabling all "session"-entries except the first in the
> > /etc/pam.d/shh like this:
>
> Marcus !!
>
> Wünderbar ! :)
:-)
> It works when I disable other session entries.
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 21:13, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves? If they can't they should be running stable
> or at least testing?
Excuse me sir !
But well, if I run unstable and I find a strange problem
This one time, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves? If they can't they should be running stable
> or at least testing?
I think there's nothing wrong with helping someone out, no matter
which group they're run
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
diagnoseproblems themselves? If they can't they should be running stable
or at least testing?
Unstable is not just a name...
Lupe Christoph
On Wednesday, 2002-10-02 at 09:44:38 -0700, Anne Carasik wrote:
> This one time, Alex
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 21:13, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves? If they can't they should be running stable
> or at least testing?
Excuse me sir !
But well, if I run unstable and I find a strange problem
This one time, Lupe Christoph wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
> diagnoseproblems themselves? If they can't they should be running stable
> or at least testing?
I think there's nothing wrong with helping someone out, no matter
which group they're ru
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't we expect people who run unstable to
diagnoseproblems themselves? If they can't they should be running stable
or at least testing?
Unstable is not just a name...
Lupe Christoph
On Wednesday, 2002-10-02 at 09:44:38 -0700, Anne Carasik wrote:
> This one time, Ale
And the winner is .
> just a guess:
> What about disabling all "session"-entries except the first in the
> /etc/pam.d/shh like this:
Marcus !!
Wünderbar ! :)
It works when I disable other session entries.
Thanks a lot to all of you, I'm really happy to come back to ssh (telnet
sucks
Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 17:01 schrieb Alexis Sukrieh:
> At 16:56 02/10/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >did you check all module invoked in /etc/pam.d/ssh can be found
> >in /lib/security/ ?
>
> Yes it can be found.
>
> here, take a look :
Hi,
just a guess:
What about disabling all
This one time, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Well, again it is not the solution for me !
> It is yet turned off
Hmmm.. not sure.
> is this a common problem ??? I'm surprised in the way that every
> intelligent solutions you all provide to me are ineffectvie...
Hmmm.. try apt-get remove --purge o
And the winner is .
> just a guess:
> What about disabling all "session"-entries except the first in the
> /etc/pam.d/shh like this:
Marcus !!
Wünderbar ! :)
It works when I disable other session entries.
Thanks a lot to all of you, I'm really happy to come back to ssh (telnet
sucks
At 17:25 02/10/2002 +0200, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
since openssh v3.3 was released, I never got it to work well with
PAM. I think it has something to do with privilege separation, whereby
the listening daemon is unable to use PAM due to insufficient privileges,
since it is running as an unpr
since openssh v3.3 was released, I never got it to work well with
PAM. I think it has something to do with privilege separation, whereby
the listening daemon is unable to use PAM due to insufficient privileges,
since it is running as an unprivileged user. Is PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt
enabl
At 16:56 02/10/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
did you check all module invoked in /etc/pam.d/ssh can be found
in /lib/security/ ?
Yes it can be found.
here, take a look :
__
poseidon:/etc/pam.d# cat /etc/pam.d/ssh
#%PAM-1.0
auth require
Hi Alexis,
Did you setup /etc/pam.d/ssh?
-Anne
This one time, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Hehe :)
>
> yes, but before mailing here, I've supposed that there was a missing
> packagedependance in unstable and I look for pam* stuff.
>
> I found those ones
>
> libpam-modules - Pluggable Authenticati
did you check all module invoked in /etc/pam.d/ssh can be found
in /lib/security/ ?
c++, Tonio
En réponse à Anne Carasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi there,
>
> This might provide a clue:
> debug1: PAM setting tty to \"/dev/pts/3\"
> PAM session setup failed[28]: Module is unknown
>
> -Anne
>
Hehe :)
yes, but before mailing here, I've supposed that there was a missing
packagedependance in unstable and I look for pam* stuff.
I found those ones
libpam-modules - Pluggable Authentication Modules for PAM
libpam0g - Pluggable Authentication Modules library
and I installed it.
I also i
Hi there,
This might provide a clue:
debug1: PAM setting tty to "/dev/pts/3"
PAM session setup failed[28]: Module is unknown
-Anne
This one time, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> here is the full output
>
> ( I've turned UsePrivilegeSeparation to "no" )
>
>
>
Am Mittwoch, 2. Oktober 2002 17:01 schrieb Alexis Sukrieh:
> At 16:56 02/10/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >did you check all module invoked in /etc/pam.d/ssh can be found
> >in /lib/security/ ?
>
> Yes it can be found.
>
> here, take a look :
Hi,
just a guess:
What about disabling all
here is the full output
( I've turned UsePrivilegeSeparation to "no" )
___
poseidon:~# sshd -ddd
debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_3.4p1 Debian 1:3.4p1-2
debug3: Not a RSA1 key file /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key.
debug1: read PEM private key done: type
Kill your sshd. Run it in debugging mode (it will not
fork a process):
# sshd -ddd
Open another window, now run the client in verbose mode:
$ ssh -vvv [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Then email us the output. :) Otherwise, this is really difficult
to troubleshoot.
-Anne
This one time, Alexis Sukrieh wrot
This one time, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Well, again it is not the solution for me !
> It is yet turned off
Hmmm.. not sure.
> is this a common problem ??? I'm surprised in the way that every
> intelligent solutions you all provide to me are ineffectvie...
Hmmm.. try apt-get remove --purge
You're right, it was set to yes but after putting it to 'no', the same
problem is still there...
At 16:11 02/10/2002 +0200, you wrote:
You need to turn off UsePrivilegeSeparation
in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file.
"UsePrivilegeSeparation no"
Alexis Sukrieh (sukria), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.
You need to turn off UsePrivilegeSeparation
in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file.
"UsePrivilegeSeparation no"
Cheers.
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 16:00, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Hello there :)
>
> I run debian unstable.
>
> I've just upgraded to the latest ssh package and I cannot connect to my box
>
At 17:25 02/10/2002 +0200, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
> since openssh v3.3 was released, I never got it to work well with
>PAM. I think it has something to do with privilege separation, whereby
>the listening daemon is unable to use PAM due to insufficient privileges,
>since it is running as an
since openssh v3.3 was released, I never got it to work well with
PAM. I think it has something to do with privilege separation, whereby
the listening daemon is unable to use PAM due to insufficient privileges,
since it is running as an unprivileged user. Is PAMAuthenticationViaKbdInt
enab
At 16:56 02/10/2002 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>did you check all module invoked in /etc/pam.d/ssh can be found
>in /lib/security/ ?
Yes it can be found.
here, take a look :
__
poseidon:/etc/pam.d# cat /etc/pam.d/ssh
#%PAM-1.0
auth require
Hi Alexis,
Did you setup /etc/pam.d/ssh?
-Anne
This one time, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Hehe :)
>
> yes, but before mailing here, I've supposed that there was a missing
> packagedependance in unstable and I look for pam* stuff.
>
> I found those ones
>
> libpam-modules - Pluggable Authenticat
did you check all module invoked in /etc/pam.d/ssh can be found
in /lib/security/ ?
c++, Tonio
En réponse à Anne Carasik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi there,
>
> This might provide a clue:
> debug1: PAM setting tty to \"/dev/pts/3\"
> PAM session setup failed[28]: Module is unknown
>
> -Anne
Hehe :)
yes, but before mailing here, I've supposed that there was a missing
packagedependance in unstable and I look for pam* stuff.
I found those ones
libpam-modules - Pluggable Authentication Modules for PAM
libpam0g - Pluggable Authentication Modules library
and I installed it.
I also in
Hi there,
This might provide a clue:
debug1: PAM setting tty to "/dev/pts/3"
PAM session setup failed[28]: Module is unknown
-Anne
This one time, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> here is the full output
>
> ( I've turned UsePrivilegeSeparation to "no" )
>
>
> ___
here is the full output
( I've turned UsePrivilegeSeparation to "no" )
___
poseidon:~# sshd -ddd
debug1: sshd version OpenSSH_3.4p1 Debian 1:3.4p1-2
debug3: Not a RSA1 key file /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key.
debug1: read PEM private key done: type
Kill your sshd. Run it in debugging mode (it will not
fork a process):
# sshd -ddd
Open another window, now run the client in verbose mode:
$ ssh -vvv user@host
Then email us the output. :) Otherwise, this is really difficult
to troubleshoot.
-Anne
This one time, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Yo
You're right, it was set to yes but after putting it to 'no', the same
problem is still there...
At 16:11 02/10/2002 +0200, you wrote:
>You need to turn off UsePrivilegeSeparation
>in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file.
>
>"UsePrivilegeSeparation no"
Alexis Sukrieh (sukria), <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
You need to turn off UsePrivilegeSeparation
in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config file.
"UsePrivilegeSeparation no"
Cheers.
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 16:00, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Hello there :)
>
> I run debian unstable.
>
> I've just upgraded to the latest ssh package and I cannot connect to my box
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
