hi honey how are you
doing.
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 09:07:19PM +1100, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> > I am having a problem in logging into my linux machine it is saying me
> > that authentication failure
> Try putting in the correct username and password; that should solve
> that problem.
> More seriously: this isn't a bug repor
On 11 Mar 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am having a problem in logging into my linux machine it is saying me
> that authentication failure
Try putting in the correct username and password; that should solve
that problem.
More seriously: this isn't a bug report, or a problem, it is a
statem
Hi Tom
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 07:46:01PM +0100, Tom Breza wrote:
>Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
>don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
>also is strage a X-UIDL,
>what can generate that kind of mail and why is empty?
do you
Hi Tom
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 07:46:01PM +0100, Tom Breza wrote:
>Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
>don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
>also is strage a X-UIDL,
>what can generate that kind of mail and why is empty?
do yo
[Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 08:42:34AM +0200] vdongen :
> I do have snort installed and it gives me nicely daily status logs
> containing absolutely nothing
Have you configured snort ? Iff not, this can be done via the debconf
front-end or via 'hand'.
--
ragOO, VU2RGU http://gnuhead.net.dhi
, how would you recognize the light?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Breza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 21:24:41 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Hi :>
> >
> > Previously Tom Breza wrote:
>
[Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 08:42:34AM +0200] vdongen :
> I do have snort installed and it gives me nicely daily status logs
> containing absolutely nothing
Have you configured snort ? Iff not, this can be done via the debconf
front-end or via 'hand'.
--
ragOO, VU2RGU http://gnuhead.net.dh
, how would you recognize the light?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Breza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 21:24:41 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Hi :>
> >
> > Previously Tom Breza wrote:
>
Previously Tom Breza wrote:
> No I don't have a snort in the system
> Any other sugestions?
Can't think of anything. Check the email timings to see if the
correspond to a crontab maybe.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-proo
* Tom Breza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.10.18 21:26:17+0100]:
> but I don't have a snort, and this message I got second times, first time
> I benn to busy and just ignore, but that seems to be repeat...
what time? if 6am'ish, then try all you cron.daily scripts by hand and
see which one emails you (
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.10.18 15:02:19-0400]:
> > Please let me know also,
> > because I have been getting empty messages from root too
>
> snort in stable and in testing seems to do this out of the box.
> however, the UID *is* weird...
but I don't have a snort, and thi
>
> Previously Tom Breza wrote:
> > Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
> > don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
>
> Do you have snort installed?
Hi Wichert
No I don't have a snort in the system
Any other sugestions?
Tom
>
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.10.18 15:02:19-0400]:
> Please let me know also,
> because I have been getting empty messages from root too
snort in stable and in testing seems to do this out of the box.
however, the UID *is* weird...
--
martin; (greetings from the hea
Previously Tom Breza wrote:
> Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
> don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
Do you have snort installed?
Wichert.
--
_
/ Not
Please let me know also,
because I have been getting empty messages from root too
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Tom Breza wrote:
>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:46:01 +0100 (BST)
>From: Tom Breza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Hi :>
>Resent-From: debian-security@lists.de
Previously Tom Breza wrote:
> No I don't have a snort in the system
> Any other sugestions?
Can't think of anything. Check the email timings to see if the
correspond to a crontab maybe.
Wichert.
--
_
/ Nothing is fool-pro
* Tom Breza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.10.18 21:26:17+0100]:
> but I don't have a snort, and this message I got second times, first time
> I benn to busy and just ignore, but that seems to be repeat...
what time? if 6am'ish, then try all you cron.daily scripts by hand and
see which one emails you
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.10.18 15:02:19-0400]:
> > Please let me know also,
> > because I have been getting empty messages from root too
>
> snort in stable and in testing seems to do this out of the box.
> however, the UID *is* weird...
but I don't have a snort, and th
>
> Previously Tom Breza wrote:
> > Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
> > don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
>
> Do you have snort installed?
Hi Wichert
No I don't have a snort in the system
Any other sugestions?
Tom
>
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2001.10.18 15:02:19-0400]:
> Please let me know also,
> because I have been getting empty messages from root too
snort in stable and in testing seems to do this out of the box.
however, the UID *is* weird...
--
martin; (greetings from the he
Previously Tom Breza wrote:
> Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
> don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
Do you have snort installed?
Wichert.
--
_
/ No
Please let me know also,
because I have been getting empty messages from root too
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Tom Breza wrote:
>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 19:46:01 +0100 (BST)
>From: Tom Breza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Hi :>
>Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>Hi I got this t
> how, can i see the tcp port 4350 that states to be opened useing nmap
There is _the_ official document of registered ports at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers and it claims 4350 is
"Net Device" - what ever that means. The entry is created by microsoft
so we may assume it is some wi
> how, can i see the tcp port 4350 that states to be opened useing nmap
There is _the_ official document of registered ports at
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers and it claims 4350 is
"Net Device" - what ever that means. The entry is created by microsoft
so we may assume it is some w
Hello,
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 03:05:52AM +0300, killah wrote:
> how, can i see the tcp port 4350 that states to be opened useing nmap
As root, you can do:
fuser -v -n tcp 4350
and:
lsof -i tcp:4350
The lsof command, if it finds anything, will return a PID as part of it's
outp
killah writes:
how, can i see the tcp port 4350 that states to be opened useing nmap
what is his proccess and which file is it's owned ?
You can use the "lsof" command to see what processes is bound to a given
port. As I recall, it would be "lsof -i TCP:4350" and "lsof -i UDP:4350",
but
Hello,
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 03:05:52AM +0300, killah wrote:
> how, can i see the tcp port 4350 that states to be opened useing nmap
As root, you can do:
fuser -v -n tcp 4350
and:
lsof -i tcp:4350
The lsof command, if it finds anything, will return a PID as part of it's
out
killah writes:
> how, can i see the tcp port 4350 that states to be opened useing nmap
> what is his proccess and which file is it's owned ?
>
You can use the "lsof" command to see what processes is bound to a given
port. As I recall, it would be "lsof -i TCP:4350" and "lsof -i UDP:4350",
b
29 matches
Mail list logo
