Incoming from Adeodato Sim?:
> * s. keeling [Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:52:30 -0700]:
>
> > With help from one of the list recipients, this is now verified and
> > reproducible. Something between me and those people whose keys are
> > determined by my copy of gpg to be "Bad signature", is mangling mail.
Incoming from Adeodato Sim?:
> * s. keeling [Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:52:30 -0700]:
>
> > With help from one of the list recipients, this is now verified and
> > reproducible. Something between me and those people whose keys are
> > determined by my copy of gpg to be "Bad signature", is mangling mail.
* s. keeling [Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:52:30 -0700]:
> With help from one of the list recipients, this is now verified and
> reproducible. Something between me and those people whose keys are
> determined by my copy of gpg to be "Bad signature", is mangling mail.
> Specifically, that something is fixi
* s. keeling [Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:52:30 -0700]:
> With help from one of the list recipients, this is now verified and
> reproducible. Something between me and those people whose keys are
> determined by my copy of gpg to be "Bad signature", is mangling mail.
> Specifically, that something is fixi
Incoming from s. keeling:
> Incoming from Thomas Sj?gren:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:35:49PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > > > >gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:50:12 2003 MST using DSA key ID
> > > > >946886AE
> > > > >gpg: BAD signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > >
> > > N
Incoming from s. keeling:
> Incoming from Thomas Sj?gren:
> > On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:35:49PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > > > >gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:50:12 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
> > > > >gpg: BAD signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > >
> > > Now, from t
Incoming from Thomas Sj?gren:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:35:49PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > > >gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:50:12 2003 MST using DSA key ID
> > > >946886AE
> > > >gpg: BAD signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> >
> > Now, from the same guy, same key, why do
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:35:49PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > >gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:50:12 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
> > >gpg: BAD signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
> Now, from the same guy, same key, why do I get "Bad signature?"
Is there something diffe
Incoming from Thomas Sj?gren:
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:35:49PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > > >gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:50:12 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
> > > >gpg: BAD signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> >
> > Now, from the same guy, same key, why do I get "B
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 12:35:49PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> > >gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:50:12 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
> > >gpg: BAD signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
> Now, from the same guy, same key, why do I get "Bad signature?"
Is there something diffe
Incoming from Adam ENDRODI:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 10:08:44PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 20:32:36 2003 MST using DSA key ID 16D0B8EF
> > gpg: BAD signature from "Joey Hess (email key) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
> Sometimes broken MUAs or MTAs trigger th
Incoming from Marcel Weber:
> s. keeling wrote:
>
> >gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:14:28 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
> >gpg: Good signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> >gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >gpg: There is no indicati
Incoming from Adam ENDRODI:
> On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 10:08:44PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 20:32:36 2003 MST using DSA key ID 16D0B8EF
> > gpg: BAD signature from "Joey Hess (email key) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>
> Sometimes broken MUAs or MTAs trigger th
Incoming from Marcel Weber:
> s. keeling wrote:
>
> >gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:14:28 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
> >gpg: Good signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> >gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
> >gpg: There is no indicati
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 10:08:44PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
>
> My trouble right now is verifying keys. If I send myself mail, it's
> correctly compared to my local copy (in my keyring?) and gpg says it's
> good. Other mail coming in triggers a lookup at pgp.mit.edu for keys,
> leading to strang
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:02, Marcel Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote:
> > Signing a key you don't know is not a good idea, it's easy to
> > accidentally upload a key...
> >
> > There is a gpg option "lsign" which can be used for this, it's like a
> > regular signature but it can
On Sun, Dec 21, 2003 at 10:08:44PM -0700, s. keeling wrote:
>
> My trouble right now is verifying keys. If I send myself mail, it's
> correctly compared to my local copy (in my keyring?) and gpg says it's
> good. Other mail coming in triggers a lookup at pgp.mit.edu for keys,
> leading to strang
Russell Coker wrote:
Signing a key you don't know is not a good idea, it's easy to accidentally
upload a key...
There is a gpg option "lsign" which can be used for this, it's like a regular
signature but it can never be exported.
Right: But if he is sure he trusts this key he should si
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 19:45, Marcel Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> s. keeling wrote:
> > gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:14:28 2003 MST using DSA key ID
> > 946886AE gpg: Good signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature
s. keeling wrote:
gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:14:28 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
gpg: Good signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owne
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:02, Marcel Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Russell Coker wrote:
> > Signing a key you don't know is not a good idea, it's easy to
> > accidentally upload a key...
> >
> > There is a gpg option "lsign" which can be used for this, it's like a
> > regular signature but it can
Russell Coker wrote:
Signing a key you don't know is not a good idea, it's easy to accidentally
upload a key...
There is a gpg option "lsign" which can be used for this, it's like a regular
signature but it can never be exported.
Right: But if he is sure he trusts this key he should sign it
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 19:45, Marcel Weber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> s. keeling wrote:
> > gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:14:28 2003 MST using DSA key ID
> > 946886AE gpg: Good signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
> > gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature
s. keeling wrote:
gpg: Signature made Sun Dec 21 17:14:28 2003 MST using DSA key ID 946886AE
gpg: Good signature from "Trey Sizemore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
24 matches
Mail list logo
