> I'd just like to say something. I began this thread purely because I
> didn't see Debian listed in the CERT advisory. So let me be clear about
> some things:
Sorry for some offtopic.
My english isn't excellent and so may be that You misunderstood me.
I'm using Debian more than 3 years and
I'd just like to say something. I began this thread purely because I
didn't see Debian listed in the CERT advisory. So let me be clear about
some things:
1. I was not ragging on Debian.
2. Debian as a organization does an amazing job and gets way too much
criticism. If you don't have anything
> I'd just like to say something. I began this thread purely because I
> didn't see Debian listed in the CERT advisory. So let me be clear about
> some things:
Sorry for some offtopic.
My english isn't excellent and so may be that You misunderstood me.
I'm using Debian more than 3 years and
Hi, All !
As I see, at this moment we have update for sendmail for "woody" (for "potato"
i not checked). :) So, Debian was vulnerable too (nothing strange, it must
be).
Damn, now i must replace just updated (by me, from sources) sendmails by
updated Debian packages. ;) But that's not a prob
I'd just like to say something. I began this thread purely because I
didn't see Debian listed in the CERT advisory. So let me be clear about
some things:
1. I was not ragging on Debian.
2. Debian as a organization does an amazing job and gets way too much
criticism. If you don't have anything
Hi, All !
As I see, at this moment we have update for sendmail for "woody" (for "potato"
i not checked). :) So, Debian was vulnerable too (nothing strange, it must
be).
Damn, now i must replace just updated (by me, from sources) sendmails by
updated Debian packages. ;) But that's not a prob
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
(See also the bugs from the CC).
I believe that Debian should be somehow put on the CERT vendor list:
they give the vendors more advance warning on the security issues before
they issue an advisory, allowing to issue an emergency patch.
Does anybody on this list (debi
Vassilii Khachaturov wrote:
(See also the bugs from the CC).
I believe that Debian should be somehow put on the CERT vendor list:
they give the vendors more advance warning on the security issues before
they issue an advisory, allowing to issue an emergency patch.
Does anybody on this list (debian-
Debian systems tend to use Exim by default? my installs certainly do. Mind
you I remove it and install Sendmail usually as its our "standard". So Im a
we bit concerned. No updates from security.debian as of 2:00AM NZT. Im not
blaming Debian ppl here of being slow or anything, they do a fine job of
(See also the bugs from the CC).
I believe that Debian should be somehow put on the CERT vendor list:
they give the vendors more advance warning on the security issues before
they issue an advisory, allowing to issue an emergency patch.
Does anybody on this list (debian-security) have any ties wit
Debian systems tend to use Exim by default? my installs certainly do. Mind
you I remove it and install Sendmail usually as its our "standard". So Im a
we bit concerned. No updates from security.debian as of 2:00AM NZT. Im not
blaming Debian ppl here of being slow or anything, they do a fine job of
(See also the bugs from the CC).
I believe that Debian should be somehow put on the CERT vendor list:
they give the vendors more advance warning on the security issues before
they issue an advisory, allowing to issue an emergency patch.
Does anybody on this list (debian-security) have any ties wit
12 matches
Mail list logo
