Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-22 Thread Florian Weimer
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't make the ptrace exploit work on my 2.2.19 system... but I might > be doing something wrong (I'm not quite sure what to expect). I get: > >attached >exec ./insert_shellcode 30505 >execl: Operation not permitted Since the bug

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-22 Thread Florian Weimer
Kenneth Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I can't make the ptrace exploit work on my 2.2.19 system... but I might > be doing something wrong (I'm not quite sure what to expect). I get: > >attached >exec ./insert_shellcode 30505 >execl: Operation not permitted Since the bug

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread j. rivera
Hello, I run Woody with 2.2.19 compiled from source, and the ptrace exploited worked even with an older version of Openwall  applied (scary...), but I snagged fresh kernel source and the new Openwall patch, and it fails with the message you receive ("execl: Operation not permitted."). Regards,

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> Has anyone else noticed that the included exploit does not affect > 2.2.19? I tested it on one of my boxes and got the expected 'Operation > not permitted'. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem, but I thought > taht 2.2.19 took care of (well hindered) the ptrace problems. I can't make the pt

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread Rob VanFleet
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:24:45PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > > i think Linus has already approved the patch. im not sure yet when will > > it arrive though.. > > Yes, the email linked to by that /. posting : > > > http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?id=1&mid=221337&start=2

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> i think Linus has already approved the patch. im not sure yet when will > it arrive though.. Yes, the email linked to by that /. posting : http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?id=1&mid=221337&start=2001-10-15&end=2001-10-21 has attached to it the Linus-blessed 2.2.19 patch. KEN

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread Michael C. Alonzo
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:13:19PM +0100, Niall Walsh wrote: > Hi, > > I just discovered > http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?id=1&mid=221337&start=2001-10-15&end=2001-10-21 > > thanks to /. (so I'm sure more of you are aware of it). I was just > wondering if anyone can let me k

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread j. rivera
Hello, I run Woody with 2.2.19 compiled from source, and the ptrace exploited worked even with an older version of Openwall  applied (scary...), but I snagged fresh kernel source and the new Openwall patch, and it fails with the message you receive ("execl: Operation not permitted."). Regards,

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> Has anyone else noticed that the included exploit does not affect > 2.2.19? I tested it on one of my boxes and got the expected 'Operation > not permitted'. Maybe I'm misunderstanding the problem, but I thought > taht 2.2.19 took care of (well hindered) the ptrace problems. I can't make the p

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread Rob VanFleet
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:24:45PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote: > > i think Linus has already approved the patch. im not sure yet when will > > it arrive though.. > > Yes, the email linked to by that /. posting : > > >http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?id=1&mid=221337&start=2

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread Kenneth Pronovici
> i think Linus has already approved the patch. im not sure yet when will > it arrive though.. Yes, the email linked to by that /. posting : http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?id=1&mid=221337&start=2001-10-15&end=2001-10-21 has attached to it the Linus-blessed 2.2.19 patch. KE

Re: BugTraq Kernel 2.2.19

2001-10-19 Thread Michael C. Alonzo
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:13:19PM +0100, Niall Walsh wrote: > Hi, > > I just discovered > >http://www.securityfocus.com/cgi-bin/archive.pl?id=1&mid=221337&start=2001-10-15&end=2001-10-21 > > thanks to /. (so I'm sure more of you are aware of it). I was just > wondering if anyone can let me