Hi,
> is it possible via ProFtpd to allow one specific user to write on the server
> but disable the feature for the others ?
yes, you can do it with a mixture of and
DenyAll
directives. The Limit should be re-defined (opened) later to permit specific
actions.
gi
Hi,
> is it possible via ProFtpd to allow one specific user to write on the server
> but disable the feature for the others ?
yes, you can do it with a mixture of and
DenyAll
directives. The Limit should be re-defined (opened) later to permit specific
actions.
g
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:47:47AM +0200, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
> is it possible via ProFtpd to allow one specific user to write on the server
> but disable the feature for the others ?
Are you talkin about normal access or anonymous?
When you use "normal" accounts just set up normal rights on
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:47:47AM +0200, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
Hi,
> is it possible via ProFtpd to allow one specific user to write on the server
> but disable the feature for the others ?
Are you talkin about normal access or anonymous?
When you use "normal" accounts just set up normal rights o
At 7:39 PM +0200 6/27/01, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
Moreover, I think it's a good idea to disable ftp for people with a
"real" valid shell (ie only include pseudo shells in /etc/shells) as it
isn't a secure protocol.
You should disable shell for any account that can access the machine
via any i
At 7:39 PM +0200 6/27/01, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
>Moreover, I think it's a good idea to disable ftp for people with a
>"real" valid shell (ie only include pseudo shells in /etc/shells) as it
>isn't a secure protocol.
You should disable shell for any account that can access the machine
via any
Jau,
OK, I'll see that ftpd but I'm really interested in the proftpd.
I have been told that the proftpd+mysql package adds the user
administration to proftpd. The problem is that I don't use mysql, I
have installed the PostgreSQL database manager ( and I'm very happy with
it ).
Thank you for you
Jau,
OK, I'll see that ftpd but I'm really interested in the proftpd.
I have been told that the proftpd+mysql package adds the user
administration to proftpd. The problem is that I don't use mysql, I
have installed the PostgreSQL database manager ( and I'm very happy with
it ).
Thank you for yo
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
> Yep but "false" (or "true") is NOT a shell. So they won't be able to
> execute chsh and change their login shell to a real one.
What about procmail, for example? If it is an mail-only account, it may
have procmail, and if you have procmail, you can
On Jun 27, 2001 13:07 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to...:
|> You add /bin/ftponly in /etc/shells.
|
|And if I'm not mistaken, if they are somehow now able to execute the
|chsh command, then they have a valid shell account they can log in to. :-(
|
|While they shouldn't be able to run chsh, or
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
> Yep but "false" (or "true") is NOT a shell. So they won't be able to
> execute chsh and change their login shell to a real one.
What about procmail, for example? If it is an mail-only account, it may
have procmail, and if you have procmail, you ca
On Jun 27, 2001 13:07 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote to...:
|> You add /bin/ftponly in /etc/shells.
|
|And if I'm not mistaken, if they are somehow now able to execute the
|chsh command, then they have a valid shell account they can log in to. :-(
|
|While they shouldn't be able to run chsh, or
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 19:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> And if I'm not mistaken, if they are somehow now able to execute the
> chsh command, then they have a valid shell account they can log in
> to. :-(
>
> While they shouldn't be able to run chsh, or the equivalent, putting
> their shell in
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 02:49:20AM +0200, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
> You create the link ftponly:
> ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin/false
>
> You add /bin/ftponly in /etc/shells.
And if I'm not mistaken, if they are somehow now able to execute the
chsh command, then they have a valid shell account they
Reidar Krogstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And why not /bin/true ?
> When I add ftp-only users I set their shell to /bin/true.
> That makes them able to log in with ftp without access to a shell.
[snip]
Personal preference in choosing shells: if they have access to a service on
the box, /bin/t
And why not /bin/true ?
When I add ftp-only users I set their shell to /bin/true.
That makes them able to log in with ftp without access to a shell.
At 20:54 26.06.2001 -0700, Brandon High wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:36:27AM +0200, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
>
> > ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin/fal
Thanks for all your answers.
With that I suppose that "proftpd" does not accept users with the
"/bin/false" shell, isn that true ?
Another question related to this one. Are there any configuration file
where we can configure the host access ( wich user is to access to
wich service ) ?
( sor
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 19:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> And if I'm not mistaken, if they are somehow now able to execute the
> chsh command, then they have a valid shell account they can log in
> to. :-(
>
> While they shouldn't be able to run chsh, or the equivalent, putting
> their shell i
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 02:49:20AM +0200, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
> You create the link ftponly:
> ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin/false
>
> You add /bin/ftponly in /etc/shells.
And if I'm not mistaken, if they are somehow now able to execute the
chsh command, then they have a valid shell account they
Reidar Krogstad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> And why not /bin/true ?
> When I add ftp-only users I set their shell to /bin/true.
> That makes them able to log in with ftp without access to a shell.
[snip]
Personal preference in choosing shells: if they have access to a service on
the box, /bin/
And why not /bin/true ?
When I add ftp-only users I set their shell to /bin/true.
That makes them able to log in with ftp without access to a shell.
At 20:54 26.06.2001 -0700, Brandon High wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:36:27AM +0200, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
> >
> > > ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin
Thanks for all your answers.
With that I suppose that "proftpd" does not accept users with the
"/bin/false" shell, isn that true ?
Another question related to this one. Are there any configuration file
where we can configure the host access ( wich user is to access to
wich service ) ?
( so
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 05:54, Brandon High wrote:
>
> Perhaps a silly question, but why not just set the shell to
> /bin/false?
You can. However, with ftponly, you can have 3 user levels:
false -> only mail
ftponly -> mail + FTP
??sh -> mail, FTP and shell
JM
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 05:54, Brandon High wrote:
>
> Perhaps a silly question, but why not just set the shell to
> /bin/false?
You can. However, with ftponly, you can have 3 user levels:
false -> only mail
ftponly -> mail + FTP
??sh -> mail, FTP and shell
JM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:36:27AM +0200, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
>
> > ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin/false
>
> Wow, it's quite late in Europe. It's better like that:
> ln -s /bin/false /bin/ftponly
Perhaps a silly question, but why not just set the shell to /bin/false?
-B
--
Brandon High
> ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin/false
Wow, it's quite late in Europe. It's better like that:
ln -s /bin/false /bin/ftponly
JM
On Tuesday 26 June 2001 22:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How can I create a ftp-user ?
> I know that the /bin/false shell is for non-shell users but I don't
> know how to create a mail-only or ftp-only users. Do you know how ?
You create the link ftponly:
ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin/false
You add /b
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 03:36:27AM +0200, Jean-Marc Boursot wrote:
>
> > ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin/false
>
> Wow, it's quite late in Europe. It's better like that:
> ln -s /bin/false /bin/ftponly
Perhaps a silly question, but why not just set the shell to /bin/false?
-B
--
Brandon High
> ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin/false
Wow, it's quite late in Europe. It's better like that:
ln -s /bin/false /bin/ftponly
JM
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tuesday 26 June 2001 22:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> How can I create a ftp-user ?
> I know that the /bin/false shell is for non-shell users but I don't
> know how to create a mail-only or ftp-only users. Do you know how ?
You create the link ftponly:
ln -s /bin/ftponly /bin/false
You add /
How can I create a ftp-user ?
I know that the /bin/false shell is for non-shell users but I don't know how to
create a mail-only or ftp-only users.
Do you know how ?
( sorry for my English )
--
yoros
pgpsjwAWT8gnH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
How can I create a ftp-user ?
I know that the /bin/false shell is for non-shell users but I don't know how to create
a mail-only or ftp-only users.
Do you know how ?
( sorry for my English )
--
yoros
PGP signature
Just add
DefaultRoot "~"
to the proftpd.conf
In this case it does not matter if your
user has a shell or not!
But better create ftp-users with no shell!
Regards,
Martin
On 26-Jun-2001 Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use proftpd to allow users to connect to my server via ftp. I've dec
Just add
DefaultRoot "~"
to the proftpd.conf
In this case it does not matter if your
user has a shell or not!
But better create ftp-users with no shell!
Regards,
Martin
On 26-Jun-2001 Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use proftpd to allow users to connect to my server via ftp. I've de
Look up the DefaultRoot directive in the proftpd documentation.
-hpknight
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use proftpd to allow users to connect to my server via ftp. I've declared a
> new user on my server, and set its home directory to /home/newuser. But in
> this case, I
Look up the DefaultRoot directive in the proftpd documentation.
-hpknight
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Luc MAIGNAN wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I use proftpd to allow users to connect to my server via ftp. I've declared a
> new user on my server, and set its home directory to /home/newuser. But in
> this case,
36 matches
Mail list logo
