Re: NEWS RELEASE

2002-07-03 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Phillip Hofmeister ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:53:05PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > > See? I don't know who configured 4.7 as threshold (should be 4.2, anyhow), > > but for my private purposes I consider 2.0 as the upper limit. > Here's a novel idea... > If hitt

RE: NEWS RELEASE

2002-07-02 Thread Howland, Curtis
This kind of dialog is important, because people find out what tools are available. It's convinced me to give procmail/spamassassin a try (soon...) even though I only get about 50 spam messages a day, easily and quickly deleted in elm without hazard of super-smart virii or HTML scripts. I love h

Re: NEWS RELEASE

2002-07-02 Thread Mack Earnhardt
Well, my bad on the reply without snippage. I guess everyone has to choose for themselves how much filtering is enough. If I have to delete it, that means it reached its destination. Phillip Hofmeister wrote: On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:53:05PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: See?

Re: NEWS RELEASE

2002-07-02 Thread Phillip Hofmeister
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 10:53:05PM +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > See? I don't know who configured 4.7 as threshold (should be 4.2, anyhow), > but for my private purposes I consider 2.0 as the upper limit. > Here's a novel idea... If hitting "D" (or whatever key your MUA uses) bothers y

Re: NEWS RELEASE

2002-07-02 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Florent Rougon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Christoph Moench-Tegeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's your fault if you don't filter on X-Spam-Status. > FYI (sorry for the long line), it was: > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.3 required=4.7 See? I don't know who configured 4.7 as threshold (should be

Re: NEWS RELEASE

2002-07-02 Thread Florent Rougon
Christoph Moench-Tegeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's your fault if you don't filter on X-Spam-Status. FYI (sorry for the long line), it was: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.3 required=4.7 tests=SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,CLICK_BELOW,SUBJ_REMOVE,MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ,MAILTO_WITH_SUBJ_REMOVE,SUPERLONG_LINE,FREQ_SP

Re: NEWS RELEASE

2002-07-02 Thread Christoph Moench-Tegeder
## Mack Earnhardt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > These assholes are already in SpamCop's RBL. It would be nice to have a > _little_ blocking. It's your fault if you don't filter on X-Spam-Status. And thank you very much for distributing that piece of spam one more time, my procmailrc did catch it the f

Re: NEWS RELEASE

2002-07-02 Thread Mack Earnhardt
These assholes are already in SpamCop's RBL. It would be nice to have a _little_ blocking. -Mack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: BOATERS, SWIMMERS, FISHERMEN, CANOEISTS, KAYAKERS---ALL WATERSPORTSMEN: A MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH IN WATER SAFETY! GET RID OF BULKY LIFE VESTS FOREVER--- The World's Most C