Apparently it is possible with Firebox 2 using ipsec manual:
http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/users/2001-June/000566.html
Hi Marcel,
> Does anybody know if there are any news concerning freeswan and
> Watchguard Firebox 2 interoperability? Some time ago I read that the two
> would not work together, as Watchguard does not use triple DES during
> the negotiation phase. Is there a patch around for freeswan?
>
Th
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 12:20:27PM +0200, Marcel Weber wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi
>
> Does anybody know if there are any news concerning freeswan and
> Watchguard Firebox 2 interoperability? Some time ago I read that the two
> would not work together, as Watchguard does not use triple DES duri
>, debian-security@lists.debian.org
Tárgy: RE: IPSec VPN
Dátum: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 12:55:18 +0200
- If so which is compatible? Is FreeSWan compatible?
FreeSWan is compatible, but only as a "Branch Office" tunnel, not as a
dynamic Client tunnel. Check with the administrator
connection.
Idézve: Dátum: 2002/8/14 12:55:18. Feladó: Johan Segernas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
>
> Feladó: Johan Segernas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Címzett:'Jeff' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-security@lists.debian.org
> Tárgy: RE: IPSec VPN
> Dát
Title: RE: IPSec VPN
> > - If so which is compatible? Is FreeSWan compatible?
>
> FreeSWan is compatible, but only as a "Branch Office" tunnel, not as a
> dynamic Client tunnel. Check with the administrator of the Contivity
> VPN Switch on whether he/she is will
Jens Hafner, 2002-Aug-13 09:28 +0200:
>
> Thanks to all who took time to reply to my questions about the VPN
> network.
> After reading the articles you directed me at (including the "Freeswan
> page" and the "VPN Masquerade HOWTO", I find that it might be a better
> idea to not masquerade the VPN
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 09:28:37AM +0200, Jens Hafner wrote:
>
> Thanks to all who took time to reply to my questions about the VPN
> network.
> After reading the articles you directed me at (including the "Freeswan
> page" and the "VPN Masquerade HOWTO", I find that it might be a better
> idea to
Thanks to all who took time to reply to my questions about the VPN
network.
After reading the articles you directed me at (including the "Freeswan
page" and the "VPN Masquerade HOWTO", I find that it might be a better
idea to not masquerade the VPN client on the WIN2K machine but to
install an VPN
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Jens Hafner wrote:
> I'm trying to connect my Win2k professional Laptop to my company's VPN.
The VPN-Masquerade-HOWTO has full instructions on the patching of a 2.2
kernel to masquerade IPSEC. It is available at
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/VPN-Masquerade-H
Jens Hafner, 2002-Aug-11 17:40 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to connect my Win2k professional Laptop to my company's VPN.
> I am using the "Nortel Extranet Access Client V02_62.33", which uses the
> IPSec protocol. Everything just works fine as long as the laptop is
> directly connected to the Inter
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:40:15PM +0200, Jens Hafner wrote:
> directly connected to the Internet (e.g. by a dialup connection). Things
> start to break as soon as I connect the laptop to my private network
> (192.168.0.0/24) whose default gateway is a debian (woody, kernel
> 2.2.19) box. I configu
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 17:40:15 +0200, Jens Hafner wrote:
> Things start to break as soon as I connect the laptop to my private
> network (192.168.0.0/24) whose default gateway is a debian (woody, kernel
> 2.2.19) box. I configured the gateway to accept protocol 50 packages and
> port 500 connecti
13 matches
Mail list logo
