I like both. The server gets "stable", but a firewall or at least firewall
rules on the "public" interface.
Preferrably duel interface, one "inside" on private IP, one "public", and no
packet forwarding.
And I couldn't agree more about the remarkable efforts of the Debian team
members.
Curt-
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 07:49:08PM -0400, Arthur H. Johnson II wrote:
>
> I have two relative policies:
>
> 1. Always use a firewall to filter out everything but what is absolutely
> necessary, ie web, email, etc.
>
> 2. Always build stuff filtered to the internet from source that way when a
> v
I have two relative policies:
1. Always use a firewall to filter out everything but what is absolutely
necessary, ie web, email, etc.
2. Always build stuff filtered to the internet from source that way when a
vulnerability is released, you can update it rather quickly, no matter
what the distro
Quoting Ren? Seindal ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I don't know about apache-ssl
libapache-mod-ssl is in incoming.
Greets,
Robert
--
( o> Linux Generation
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 17:40, Marcel Weber wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I got a little question, a bit silly perhaps. When will there be any
> packages of Apache 1.3.26 or a backported patch for 1.3.24 for woody?...
As the list archive from 7 hrs and 20 mins ago says - the packages are
out. Look above.
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Marcel Weber wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I got a little question, a bit silly perhaps. When will there be any
> packages of Apache 1.3.26 or a backported patch for 1.3.24 for woody? Will
> it be in the next time or would it make sense to upgrade by hand, say by
> compiling one's o
On Thu, 2002-06-20 at 17:40, Marcel Weber wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I got a little question, a bit silly perhaps. When will there be any
> packages of Apache 1.3.26 or a backported patch for 1.3.24 for woody? Will
> it be in the next time or would it make sense to upgrade by hand, say by
> compiling o
7 matches
Mail list logo
