Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Nick Phillips
Petr Cech wrote: > > Is this really a good idea? Since the exim install does a fair bit of > > what is a not a good idea? Leaving it as it always was? Leaving tcpwrapper support out... As for default config, probably just "exim: ALL: severity mail.info: allow" or some such. There seem to be far

Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Petr Cech
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:11:45PM + , Nick Phillips wrote: > Petr Cech wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is > > > triggert, although i

Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Nick Phillips
Petr Cech wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is > > triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow > > and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT > >

Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Nick Phillips
Petr Cech wrote: > > Is this really a good idea? Since the exim install does a fair bit of > > what is a not a good idea? Leaving it as it always was? Leaving tcpwrapper support out... As for default config, probably just "exim: ALL: severity mail.info: allow" or some such. There seem to be far

Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Petr Cech
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:11:45PM + , Nick Phillips wrote: > Petr Cech wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is > > > triggert, although i

Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Nick Phillips
Petr Cech wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is > > triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow > > and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT > >

Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Petr Cech
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:13:40AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote: > :( I use the slink defaults. It's triggert with > inetd: /usr/sbin/exim exim -bs, so I thought it > should do the job. > > So I have to recompile or call it via tcpd both will work, but the tcpd approach is easier :) > instead? > > -

Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Petr Cech
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is > triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow > and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT > LOCAL. do you run exim via tcpd? Exim itself is not compil

Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Petr Cech
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:13:40AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote: > :( I use the slink defaults. It's triggert with > inetd: /usr/sbin/exim exim -bs, so I thought it > should do the job. > > So I have to recompile or call it via tcpd both will work, but the tcpd approach is easier :) > instead? > >

Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Rolf Kutz
Hi, I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT LOCAL. Daemonmode is off, System is Slink. Tested is with telnet IP smtp. - Rolf

Re: Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Petr Cech
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:29:01AM +0100 , Rolf Kutz wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is > triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow > and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT > LOCAL. do you run exim via tcpd? Exim itself is not compil

Problem with inetd and exim.

2000-11-06 Thread Rolf Kutz
Hi, I have a Problem with inetd and exim. Exim is triggert, although it is not listed in hosts.allow and hosts.deny is All: All or All: All EXCEPT LOCAL. Daemonmode is off, System is Slink. Tested is with telnet IP smtp. - Rolf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject