Hmmm what did you have to change in your Ipchains Rules for the
forwarded ports?
I've noticed everyone like to say 'I didn't have to install'... that's
nice but what did you have to do to existing software.
This comes on the heels.. distant heels of my Ipchains/Portfw post
regarding running a D
Hmmm what did you have to change in your Ipchains Rules for the
forwarded ports?
I've noticed everyone like to say 'I didn't have to install'... that's
nice but what did you have to do to existing software.
This comes on the heels.. distant heels of my Ipchains/Portfw post
regarding running a
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Viljo Marrandi wrote:
> > > > > > > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > > > > > > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > > > > > > server to be accessed from Internet).
>
> I used 'ipmasqadm portfw', worked perfectly (potato ext firewa
> > > > > > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > > > > > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > > > > > server to be accessed from Internet).
I used 'ipmasqadm portfw', worked perfectly (potato ext firewall -> int
https server. If you already have masquera
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Viljo Marrandi wrote:
> > > > > > > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > > > > > > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > > > > > > server to be accessed from Internet).
>
> I used 'ipmasqadm portfw', worked perfectly (potato ext firew
> > > > > > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > > > > > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > > > > > server to be accessed from Internet).
I used 'ipmasqadm portfw', worked perfectly (potato ext firewall -> int
https server. If you already have masquer
Even more stable: use fastforward (it's on freshmeat somewhere).
Eelco
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-1] Johan Bergstr?m wrote:
>
> There is also a little application called redir.
> Simple and easy.
>
> Johbe
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Michael Boman wrote:
>
> > Kelsey Damas wrote:
> > >
> > >
There is also a little application called redir.
Simple and easy.
Johbe
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Michael Boman wrote:
> Kelsey Damas wrote:
> >
> > > > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > > > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > > > server to be accessed
Even more stable: use fastforward (it's on freshmeat somewhere).
Eelco
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, [iso-8859-1] Johan Bergström wrote:
>
> There is also a little application called redir.
> Simple and easy.
>
> Johbe
>
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Michael Boman wrote:
>
> > Kelsey Damas wrote:
> > >
> > >
Hi,
could you please help me select proper solution for port
forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
server to be accessed from Internet).
It is hard to belive that the only solution for kernel
2.2.17 is patching it with experimental ipmasqadm module.
Are there any other secure and
There is also a little application called redir.
Simple and easy.
Johbe
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Michael Boman wrote:
> Kelsey Damas wrote:
> >
> > > > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > > > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > > > server to be accessed
> could you please help me select proper solution for port
> forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> server to be accessed from Internet).
http://rdb.linux-help.org/ipmasq/ipmasq.php3#ipmasqadm
> It is hard to belive that the only solution for kernel
> 2.2.17 is patching it with e
Kelsey Damas wrote:
>
> > > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > > server to be accessed from Internet).
>
> What about rinetd? It's a TCP port redirector. Userland, no patching...
>
> http://packages.debian.org
> > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > server to be accessed from Internet).
What about rinetd? It's a TCP port redirector. Userland, no patching...
http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/rinetd.html
I've found i
> could you please help me select proper solution for port
> forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> server to be accessed from Internet).
http://rdb.linux-help.org/ipmasq/ipmasq.php3#ipmasqadm
> It is hard to belive that the only solution for kernel
> 2.2.17 is patching it with ex
The portfw module for ipmasqadm is quite stable, and as far as I know it
is the only solution for port forwarding in the 2.2.x series kernels. I
have used it before and have not had any problems with it, nor has anyone
I know. If it was really experimental and unstable, it would have some
warning
Hi,
could you please help me select proper solution for port
forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
server to be accessed from Internet).
It is hard to belive that the only solution for kernel
2.2.17 is patching it with experimental ipmasqadm module.
Are there any other secure and
Kelsey Damas wrote:
>
> > > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > > server to be accessed from Internet).
>
> What about rinetd? It's a TCP port redirector. Userland, no patching...
>
> http://packages.debian.or
> > could you please help me select proper solution for port
> > forwarding (one IP, Potato firewall and internal WWW
> > server to be accessed from Internet).
What about rinetd? It's a TCP port redirector. Userland, no patching...
http://packages.debian.org/stable/net/rinetd.html
I've found
The portfw module for ipmasqadm is quite stable, and as far as I know it
is the only solution for port forwarding in the 2.2.x series kernels. I
have used it before and have not had any problems with it, nor has anyone
I know. If it was really experimental and unstable, it would have some
warnin
20 matches
Mail list logo
