Re: Packet log

2001-03-27 Thread Karl Hammar
--- From: "David Priban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Packet log Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 02:16:38 -0500 > I have been seeing a lot of these entries in my logs lately. > Could this be some sort of legitimate traffic triggering this ipchains rule? > Or is it just plain sp

Re: Packet log

2001-03-27 Thread Karl Hammar
--- From: "David Priban" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Packet log Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 02:16:38 -0500 > I have been seeing a lot of these entries in my logs lately. > Could this be some sort of legitimate traffic triggering this ipchains rule? > Or is it just plain sp

Re: Packet log

2001-03-27 Thread Alson van der Meulen
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:16:38AM -0500, David Priban wrote: > I have been seeing a lot of these entries in my logs lately. > Could this be some sort of legitimate traffic triggering this ipchains rule? > Or is it just plain spoofing attempt by someone? > > Thanks David > &g

Packet log

2001-03-27 Thread David Priban
I have been seeing a lot of these entries in my logs lately. Could this be some sort of legitimate traffic triggering this ipchains rule? Or is it just plain spoofing attempt by someone? Thanks David kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth1 PROTO=17 127.0.0.1:2301 255.255.255.255:2301 L=240 S=0x00 I

Re: Packet log

2001-03-26 Thread Alson van der Meulen
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 02:16:38AM -0500, David Priban wrote: > I have been seeing a lot of these entries in my logs lately. > Could this be some sort of legitimate traffic triggering this ipchains rule? > Or is it just plain spoofing attempt by someone? > > Thanks David > &g

Packet log

2001-03-26 Thread David Priban
I have been seeing a lot of these entries in my logs lately. Could this be some sort of legitimate traffic triggering this ipchains rule? Or is it just plain spoofing attempt by someone? Thanks David kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth1 PROTO=17 127.0.0.1:2301 255.255.255.255:2301 L=240 S=0x00