On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:20:44PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
thanks, this confirm me that i really have to avoid it ;)
cheers,
JeF
> ## Jean-Francois Dive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption
> > mechanism. I'd like
> > to ha
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 03:20:44PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
thanks, this confirm me that i really have to avoid it ;)
cheers,
JeF
> ## Jean-Francois Dive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism. I'd
>like
> > to have
## Jean-Francois Dive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism.
> I'd like
> to have the impressions from people of the list about the cryptographic
> strenght of
> such algorithm, especially now that wireless WEP RC4 based encryption hav
## Jean-Francois Dive ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism. I'd like
> to have the impressions from people of the list about the cryptographic strenght of
> such algorithm, especially now that wireless WEP RC4 based encryption have bee
hi all,
I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism.
I'd like
to have the impressions from people of the list about the cryptographic
strenght of
such algorithm, especially now that wireless WEP RC4 based encryption have been
broken.
I understand that the proble
hi all,
I was wondering: PPTP use RC4 up to 128 bit keys as an encryption mechanism. I'd like
to have the impressions from people of the list about the cryptographic strenght of
such algorithm, especially now that wireless WEP RC4 based encryption have been
broken.
I understand that the problem
6 matches
Mail list logo