Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-25 Thread Jean-Francois Dive
TP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org; debian-security@lists.debian.org > Subject:Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM > > Hello, > > The

Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-25 Thread Jean-Francois Dive
IL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:17 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM > > Hello, > > The adsl protocol is based on ATM

RE: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-22 Thread VERBEEK, Francois
Subject: Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM Hello, The adsl protocol is based on ATM anyhow. ATM cells leave the CPE (the thing which have the phone line in) to reach the local DSLAM which aggregare multiple client and then goes in a WAN which may be quit

RE: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-22 Thread VERBEEK, Francois
.com (if I remember well) -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Dive [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2002 2:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PPPoverE

Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-21 Thread Jean-Francois Dive
Hello, The adsl protocol is based on ATM anyhow. ATM cells leave the CPE (the thing which have the phone line in) to reach the local DSLAM which aggregare multiple client and then goes in a WAN which may be quite a lot of things. The question to know if you have to run pppoe or pppoatm is to know

Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-21 Thread Jean-Francois Dive
Hello, The adsl protocol is based on ATM anyhow. ATM cells leave the CPE (the thing which have the phone line in) to reach the local DSLAM which aggregare multiple client and then goes in a WAN which may be quite a lot of things. The question to know if you have to run pppoe or pppoatm is to know

Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-21 Thread Louis Poncet
In my opinion You will have a nat support the cisco router give tou a standart TCP/IP adresse on an ethernet netwrk. Debian computer will not use PPP over ATM, it is th router who will do that. But I'm not sure. On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 08:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm about

PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-21 Thread linux_abbestia
I'm about to turn to ADSL connection to Internet and I'm taking in consideration all the choises the Provider offer. I was surprised in seening they offer an ADSL service not only using the PPP-over-Eth protocol, but also with the PPP-over-ATM. So my question is: if I choose the second system, is d

Re: PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-21 Thread Louis Poncet
In my opinion You will have a nat support the cisco router give tou a standart TCP/IP adresse on an ethernet netwrk. Debian computer will not use PPP over ATM, it is th router who will do that. But I'm not sure. On Thursday, February 21, 2002, at 08:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm abou

PPPoverEthernet vs. PPPoverATM

2002-02-20 Thread linux_abbestia
I'm about to turn to ADSL connection to Internet and I'm taking in consideration all the choises the Provider offer. I was surprised in seening they offer an ADSL service not only using the PPP-over-Eth protocol, but also with the PPP-over-ATM. So my question is: if I choose the second system, is