On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:12:54PM +0300, Riku Anttila wrote:
> According to http://www.openssh.com/txt/sshpam.adv there are multiple
> vulnerabilities in the "new PAM code of Portable OpenSSH".
>
> It sounds as if it's limited to versions 3.7p1 and3.7.1p1, but I thought
> I'd ask if anyone kno
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 12:12:54PM +0300, Riku Anttila wrote:
> According to http://www.openssh.com/txt/sshpam.adv there are multiple
> vulnerabilities in the "new PAM code of Portable OpenSSH".
>
> It sounds as if it's limited to versions 3.7p1 and3.7.1p1, but I thought
> I'd ask if anyone kno
My understanding and look at the changelog is that there has been a
significant amount of work in the pam components of openssh from version
3.6.x to 3.7x. It is this new code, that has the vulnerability.
Ramon Kagan
York University, Computing and Network Services
Unix Team - Senior Unix Systems
My understanding and look at the changelog is that there has been a
significant amount of work in the pam components of openssh from version
3.6.x to 3.7x. It is this new code, that has the vulnerability.
Ramon Kagan
York University, Computing and Network Services
Unix Team - Senior Unix Systems
According to http://www.openssh.com/txt/sshpam.adv there are multiple
vulnerabilities in the "new PAM code of Portable OpenSSH".
It sounds as if it's limited to versions 3.7p1 and3.7.1p1, but I thought
I'd ask if anyone knows for a fact that the older version in Woody does
not have this code.
According to http://www.openssh.com/txt/sshpam.adv there are multiple
vulnerabilities in the "new PAM code of Portable OpenSSH".
It sounds as if it's limited to versions 3.7p1 and3.7.1p1, but I thought
I'd ask if anyone knows for a fact that the older version in Woody does
not have this code.
6 matches
Mail list logo
