Hi,
> It's there in Sid already (maybe Woody too -- haven't checked). If
In Woody too.
> Does anyone know if xscreensaver-demo on Potato have an option like
> that?
No it hasn't.
Disabling the feature on each box would be easier at install, but I
respect the maintainer choice. Working in a R&D
Hi,
> It's there in Sid already (maybe Woody too -- haven't checked). If
In Woody too.
> Does anyone know if xscreensaver-demo on Potato have an option like
> that?
No it hasn't.
Disabling the feature on each box would be easier at install, but I
respect the maintainer choice. Working in a R&D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Thomas> perhaps a *wishlist* item could be added to make this easy to
Thomas> toggle from the gnome (or other) capplets.
It's there in Sid already (maybe Woody too -- haven't c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> "Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Thomas> perhaps a *wishlist* item could be added to make this easy to
Thomas> toggle from the gnome (or other) capplets.
It's there in Sid already (maybe Woody too -- haven't
Benoît Sibaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For now, the xscreensaver maintainer disagrees.
> "I disagree. It is NOT a security issue, it has been discussed the last
> 3 times it was brought up, and it's easy enough to change if it bothers
> you. Neither your bug or the discussion you pointed to a
Benoît Sibaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For now, the xscreensaver maintainer disagrees.
> "I disagree. It is NOT a security issue, it has been discussed the last
> 3 times it was brought up, and it's easy enough to change if it bothers
> you. Neither your bug or the discussion you pointed to
Ted Cabeen wrote:
> Good call. The default should probably be set to off. A debconf questio=
> n of "low" priority would probably also be a good thing.
I opened the #128169 bug report (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=128169 )
"For security reasons, xscreensaver shouldn't be all
Ted Cabeen wrote:
> Good call. The default should probably be set to off. A debconf questio=
> n of "low" priority would probably also be a good thing.
I opened the #128169 bug report (
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=128169 )
"For security reasons, xscreensaver shouldn't be al
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Ben=
o=3DEEt?=3D =
Sibaud writes:
>Hi,
>> Xscreensaver has options that let you prevent screensavers from grabbi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Ben=
o=3DEEt?=3D =
Sibaud writes:
>Hi,
>> Xscreensaver has options that let you prevent screensavers from grabb
Hi,
> Xscreensaver has options that let you prevent screensavers from grabbing =
>
> desktop images. If you run xscreensaver-demo, it's in the options tab. =
>
> =46rom my brief look, none of the xlockmore modes grab the screen.
It's correct, but that grabbing desktop images is enable by defa
Hi,
> Xscreensaver has options that let you prevent screensavers from grabbing =
>
> desktop images. If you run xscreensaver-demo, it's in the options tab. =
>
> =46rom my brief look, none of the xlockmore modes grab the screen.
It's correct, but that grabbing desktop images is enable by def
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Ben=
o=3DEEt?=3D =
Sibaud writes:
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see any "security level
>configuration"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, =3D?iso-8859-1?Q?Ben=
o=3DEEt?=3D =
Sibaud writes:
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see any "security level
>configuration
Hi,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see any "security level
configuration" for both xscreensaver or xlockmore. What I mean is a way
to choose something like a class of screensavers, like 'secure' or 'fun'
or both: all screensavers save the screen, but they don't all protect
privacy; some scr
Hi,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I didn't see any "security level
configuration" for both xscreensaver or xlockmore. What I mean is a way
to choose something like a class of screensavers, like 'secure' or 'fun'
or both: all screensavers save the screen, but they don't all protect
privacy; some sc
16 matches
Mail list logo
