On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51AM -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info?
You could subscribe to debian-changes@lists.debian.org
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-chang
On Mon, Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51AM -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info?
You could subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
See http://lists.debian.org/debian-changes/
Marcin
PS
Thanks for the info. I don't like depending on Red
Hat for security fixes. I want to rely on Debian for
this kind of stuff I just didn't know where to find
it.
Thanks
--- Ulrich Scholler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner
> wrote:
> >
Hi Bruce,
On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
> info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
> Source anywh
When were they patched? And how do I know when they
are patched and when they are available? Is there
somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
Source anywhere.
Thanks
--- Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Why download t
Thanks for the info. I don't like depending on Red
Hat for security fixes. I want to rely on Debian for
this kind of stuff I just didn't know where to find
it.
Thanks
--- Ulrich Scholler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner
> wrote:
> >
Hi Bruce,
On Mon Jul 28, 2003 at 11:38:51 -0700, Bruce Banner wrote:
> When were they patched? And how do I know when they
> are patched and when they are available? Is there
> somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
> info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
> Source anywh
Why download the source from RedHat? The source from debian is also
patched with needed patches.
apt-get install kernel-source
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 19:05, Bruce Banner wrote:
> You can download Red Hats
> kernel-source-2.4.20-19.9.i386.rpm run alien against
> it and install the dpkg'ed kernel-
You can download Red Hats
kernel-source-2.4.20-19.9.i386.rpm run alien against
it and install the dpkg'ed kernel-source.deb. I have
been forced to do this in the past to get patches that
havn't been released or in the main stream kernel from
kernel.org yet.
Peace
--- Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL
When were they patched? And how do I know when they
are patched and when they are available? Is there
somewhere I can find this info? I found the Red Hat
info on Bugtraq but there was no mention of Debian
Source anywhere.
Thanks
--- Matthijs Mohlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Why download t
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
>>> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
>>> addresses the same as the local host.
>>
>> Ah, this one. I don't even know if it's about IP.
>>
>> As usual, Red H
Why download the source from RedHat? The source from debian is also
patched with needed patches.
apt-get install kernel-source
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 19:05, Bruce Banner wrote:
> You can download Red Hats
> kernel-source-2.4.20-19.9.i386.rpm run alien against
> it and install the dpkg'ed kernel-
You can download Red Hats
kernel-source-2.4.20-19.9.i386.rpm run alien against
it and install the dpkg'ed kernel-source.deb. I have
been forced to do this in the past to get patches that
havn't been released or in the main stream kernel from
kernel.org yet.
Peace
--- Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL
Beware there is also a vulnerability in the spanning
tree implementation as well so.
Peace
--- Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I do use bridging...is there a patch?
>
> What is the consequences of an unpatched system? (In
> more detail than
> below)
>
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 a
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
>>> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
>>> addresses the same as the local host.
>>
>> Ah, this one. I don't even know if it's about IP.
>>
>> As usual, Red H
If I do use bridging...is there a patch?
What is the consequences of an unpatched system? (In more detail than
below)
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 at 07:39:53PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry
Beware there is also a vulnerability in the spanning
tree implementation as well so.
Peace
--- Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I do use bridging...is there a patch?
>
> What is the consequences of an unpatched system? (In
> more detail than
> below)
>
> On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 a
If I do use bridging...is there a patch?
What is the consequences of an unpatched system? (In more detail than
below)
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 at 07:39:53PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry
Thanks,
--- Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that
> the Forwarding table
> >> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with
> bogus source
> >> addre
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
>> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
>> addresses the same as the local host.
>
> Ah, this one. I don't even kn
Thanks,
--- Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that
> the Forwarding table
> >> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with
> bogus source
> >> addre
Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
>> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
>> addresses the same as the local host.
>
> Ah, this one. I don't even kn
Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
> addresses the same as the local host.
Ah, this one. I don't even know if it's about IP.
As usual, Red Hat's advisory is
CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the
Forwarding table could
be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
addresses the same
as the local host.
--- Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What impact does the Forwardi
Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What impact does the Forwarding Table Vulnerability of
> late have?
Which vulnerability are you talking about? Do you have CVE name for
it?
Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the Forwarding table
> could be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
> addresses the same as the local host.
Ah, this one. I don't even know if it's about IP.
As usual, Red Hat's advisory is
What impact does the Forwarding Table Vulnerability of
late have? Is this only a problem if you have ip
forwarding enabled and setup as a router or is this
part of the normal ip stack functions that affects the
kernel no matter what services you are running on your
server? I can't find any info o
CAN-2003-0552: Jerry Kreuscher discovered that the
Forwarding table could
be spoofed by sending forged packets with bogus source
addresses the same
as the local host.
--- Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > What impact does the Forwardi
Bruce Banner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What impact does the Forwarding Table Vulnerability of
> late have?
Which vulnerability are you talking about? Do you have CVE name for
it?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
What impact does the Forwarding Table Vulnerability of
late have? Is this only a problem if you have ip
forwarding enabled and setup as a router or is this
part of the normal ip stack functions that affects the
kernel no matter what services you are running on your
server? I can't find any info o
30 matches
Mail list logo
