On 01/12/12 16:16, Karl Goetz wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:19:41 +0100
> Poison Bit wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Davit Avsharyan
>> wrote:
>>> I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it
>>> comes with 755 and not 700 ?
>>> Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:19:41 +0100
Poison Bit wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Davit Avsharyan
> wrote:
> > I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it
> > comes with 755 and not 700 ?
> > Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken, everything was 700.
>
> No less than 9 yea
On 01/12/12 04:19, Poison Bit wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Davit Avsharyan wrote:
>> I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it comes with
>> 755 and not 700 ?
>> Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken, everything was 700.
The commit log(2000) is: Load adduser-3.12 int
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Chris Davies wrote:
> Poison Bit wrote:
>> Why filter to those in /etc/shells ? I mean... the filter should be
>> applied by the system :)
>
> Mainly because it's a convenient list of "real" shells, and some of the
> remote service applications require a shell to
Poison Bit wrote:
> Why filter to those in /etc/shells ? I mean... the filter should be
> applied by the system :)
Mainly because it's a convenient list of "real" shells, and some of the
remote service applications require a shell to be in that list. FTP is
one such that springs to mind. As a cou
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Chris Davies
wrote:
> Davit Avsharyan wrote:
>> 1/ I'm wondering why most of the system users have valid shells by
>> default ?
>> /cat /etc/passwd | grep -E '(sh|bash)' | wc -l
>> *21*/
>
> That's not necessarily sufficient to determine valid shells: the absenc
Davit Avsharyan wrote:
> 1/ I'm wondering why most of the system users have valid shells by
> default ?
> /cat /etc/passwd | grep -E '(sh|bash)' | wc -l
> *21*/
That's not necessarily sufficient to determine valid shells: the absence
of a shell definition implies the use of /bin/sh, so you need
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:48 AM, Davit Avsharyan wrote:
> I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it comes with
> 755 and not 700 ?
> Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken, everything was 700.
No less than 9 years.
In 2003 I see the 755:
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/add
I know how to change it :). I just wanted to understand why it comes
with 755 and not 700 ?
Few years ago, if I'm not mistaken, everything was 700.
TRJ
On 12/01/12 4:49 AM, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Kees de Jong wrote:
For the home dirs try this: dpkg-reconfigure
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:05:11 +0400
Davit Avsharyan wrote:
> Hi ppl.,
>
> 1/ I'm wondering why most of the system users have valid shells by
> default ?
>
> /cat /etc/passwd | grep -E '(sh|bash)' | wc -l
> *21*/
I've been wondering this too. If they're meant to be like that, I'm
forced to wond
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:37 AM, Kees de Jong wrote:
> For the home dirs try this: dpkg-reconfigure adduser. Then choose 'no'. I
> think that should do the trick. I am on my Android right now so I can't
> check it for you.
>
> --
> Met vriendelijke groet,
> Kees de Jong
>
> On Jan 11, 2012 10:09 A
For the home dirs try this: dpkg-reconfigure adduser. Then choose 'no'. I
think that should do the trick. I am on my Android right now so I can't
check it for you.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Kees de Jong
On Jan 11, 2012 10:09 AM, "Davit Avsharyan" wrote:
> Hi ppl.,
>
> 1/ I'm wondering why mos
Hi ppl.,
1/ I'm wondering why most of the system users have valid shells by
default ?
/cat /etc/passwd | grep -E '(sh|bash)' | wc -l
*21*/
2/ Why, by default, new users' home directories have 755 ?
Every time I create a new account, I have to change it to 700.
Why it's like this ? any speci
13 matches
Mail list logo
