> I'd just like to say something. I began this thread purely because I
> didn't see Debian listed in the CERT advisory. So let me be clear about
> some things:
Sorry for some offtopic.
My english isn't excellent and so may be that You misunderstood me.
I'm using Debian more than 3 years and
I'd just like to say something. I began this thread purely because I
didn't see Debian listed in the CERT advisory. So let me be clear about
some things:
1. I was not ragging on Debian.
2. Debian as a organization does an amazing job and gets way too much
criticism. If you don't have anything
> I'd just like to say something. I began this thread purely because I
> didn't see Debian listed in the CERT advisory. So let me be clear about
> some things:
Sorry for some offtopic.
My english isn't excellent and so may be that You misunderstood me.
I'm using Debian more than 3 years and
Hi, All !
As I see, at this moment we have update for sendmail for "woody" (for "potato"
i not checked). :) So, Debian was vulnerable too (nothing strange, it must
be).
Damn, now i must replace just updated (by me, from sources) sendmails by
updated Debian packages. ;) But that's not a prob
I'd just like to say something. I began this thread purely because I
didn't see Debian listed in the CERT advisory. So let me be clear about
some things:
1. I was not ragging on Debian.
2. Debian as a organization does an amazing job and gets way too much
criticism. If you don't have anything
Hi, All !
As I see, at this moment we have update for sendmail for "woody" (for "potato"
i not checked). :) So, Debian was vulnerable too (nothing strange, it must
be).
Damn, now i must replace just updated (by me, from sources) sendmails by
updated Debian packages. ;) But that's not a prob
(debian-security) have any ties with CERT
to do it?
- Original Message -
From: "Ramon Kagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail (fwd)
HI,
I don't see Debian listed in the
-security) have any ties with CERT
to do it?
- Original Message -
From: "Ramon Kagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail (fwd)
HI,
I don'
rg
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail
(fwd)
HI,
I don't see Debian listed in the notification list at the bottom of the
CERT Advisory. Is there any estimate on the release of patched sendmail
packages?
Ramon Kagan
York University, Computing and Network Ser
with CERT
to do it?
- Original Message -
From: "Ramon Kagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail (fwd)
> HI,
>
> I don't see Debian listed in the notification li
HI,
I don't see Debian listed in the notification list at the bottom of the
CERT Advisory. Is there any estimate on the release of patched sendmail
packages?
Ramon Kagan
York University, Computing and Network Services
Unix Team - Intermediate System Administrator
(416)736-2100 #20263
[EMAIL PRO
dvisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail
(fwd)
HI,
I don't see Debian listed in the notification list at the bottom of the
CERT Advisory. Is there any estimate on the release of patched sendmail
packages?
Ramon Kagan
York University, Computing and Network Services
Unix Team
with CERT
to do it?
- Original Message -
From: "Ramon Kagan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 4:00 PM
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-07 Remote Buffer Overflow in Sendmail (fwd)
> HI,
>
> I don't see Debian li
HI,
I don't see Debian listed in the notification list at the bottom of the
CERT Advisory. Is there any estimate on the release of patched sendmail
packages?
Ramon Kagan
York University, Computing and Network Services
Unix Team - Intermediate System Administrator
(416)736-2100 #20263
[EMAIL PRO
14 matches
Mail list logo
