On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 03:03:19PM +0100, InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
> about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
> about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any we
On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 03:03:19PM +0100, InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
> about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
> about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any we
Hi list, Here I am again and a happy newyear to all :)
- Original message -
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 20:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
>
> > I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserv
Hi list, Here I am again and a happy newyear to all :)
- Original message -
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 20:54:02 +0100 (CET)
Richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
>
> > I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserv
El Lun 30 Dic 2002 08:16, Berend De Schouwer escribió:
> I've made the mistake of running bind with debugging (to find one bug), and
> have bind create a 2GB /var/named/named.run file. Bind crashed because
> that file was too big. Doh! If your Bind crashes regularly after X days,
> see if its cr
On Wednesday, 25 December 2002 21:54, Richard wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
> > I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserver (Slackware
> > with bind 9.2.1), because there was no logging I couldn't find out why
> > bind stopped working.
>
> Take a look at memory us
El Lun 30 Dic 2002 08:16, Berend De Schouwer escribió:
> I've made the mistake of running bind with debugging (to find one bug), and
> have bind create a 2GB /var/named/named.run file. Bind crashed because
> that file was too big. Doh! If your Bind crashes regularly after X days,
> see if its cr
On Wednesday, 25 December 2002 21:54, Richard wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
> > I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserver (Slackware
> > with bind 9.2.1), because there was no logging I couldn't find out why
> > bind stopped working.
>
> Take a look at memory us
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself
> has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for
> zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest...
I have a feeling that it's possible to m
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 09:16:12AM -0500, Phillip Hofmeister wrote:
> This is on a Pentium 100 MHz with around 32 MB of RAM. The box itself
> has been up 134 days. This is the primary internet server for
> zionlth.org. Traffic to this domain is modest...
I have a feeling that it's possible to m
As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while:
2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named
2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2668 ?
El Jue 26 Dic 2002 13:26, escribió:
> Hey All,
> I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
> 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
> time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
Okay. How much RAM do u have? I have 256 MB here (and 5
Hey All,
I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
I have another machine running deb 2.2R5 with a 2.2.19 kernel, and
bind 8 (not sure of th
As you can all see, my bind9 has been up for some while:
2664 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/named -u named
2665 ?S 0:16 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2666 ?S137:29 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2667 ?S 1:04 \_ /usr/sbin/named -u named
2668 ?
El Jue 26 Dic 2002 13:26, escribió:
> Hey All,
> I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
> 9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
> time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
Okay. How much RAM do u have? I have 256 MB here (and 5
Hey All,
I have a machine running a 2.4.20 kernel on deb2.2R5, and bind
9.2.1, uptime of 43 days. I haven't had any issues with bind in this
time, but will pop in a note if anything crops up.
I have another machine running deb 2.2R5 with a 2.2.19 kernel, and
bind 8 (not sure of th
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
> I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserver (Slackware
> with bind 9.2.1), because there was no logging I couldn't find out why
> bind stopped working.
Take a look at memory usage when Bind stop's working and monitor for some
time how much
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, J.Reilink wrote:
> I've had exactly the same on our corperate primary nameserver (Slackware
> with bind 9.2.1), because there was no logging I couldn't find out why
> bind stopped working.
Take a look at memory usage when Bind stop's working and monitor for some
time how much
- Original message -
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 15:03:19 +0100
InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all
>
> I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer
> for about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company
> Domonkos Czinke
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 3:03 PM
> To: Debian security
> Subject: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime
>
>
> Hi all
>
> I've bee
ty
Subject: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any website, and noticed that the
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any website, and noticed that the
DNS server (bind 9) was stopped. It was up when I left at 1
- Original message -
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002 15:03:19 +0100
InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all
>
> I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer
> for about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company
> Domonkos Czinke
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: InfoEmergencias - Luis Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 25, 2002 3:03 PM
> To: Debian security
> Subject: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime
>
>
> Hi all
>
> I've been r
ty
Subject: Bind9 stopped after 34 days of uptime
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any website, and noticed that the
Hi all
I've been running my company's server with Linux in the same computer for
about six months. Tonight, when I arrived home (my company is in my house) at
about 6 a.m., I noticed I could not browse any website, and noticed that the
DNS server (bind 9) was stopped. It was up when I left at 1
26 matches
Mail list logo
