Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1615-1] New xulrunner packages fix several vulnerabilities

2008-07-27 Thread Rick Moen
Quoting Richard Hartmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html vs > http://www.metasystema.net/essays/reply-to.mhtml ...was obsoleted by RFCs 2822 and 2369: Munging lost. http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/index.php?page=netiquette#replyto -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1615-1] New xulrunner packages fix several vulnerabilities

2008-07-27 Thread Richard Hartmann
(Replying to list for your benefit) On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:16, Jim Popovitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also, IMHO (since this post will possibly generate more) un-subs > should also occur for people who use reply-all to a list, such as this > one, that almost guarantees the poster being r

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1615-1] New xulrunner packages fix several vulnerabilities

2008-07-27 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 01:36, Michael Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wouldn't it be better to send this person a warning? i'm sure it was > just an honest mistake. it seems rather harsh to purge them from the > mailing list without giving them a fair chance to remedy their > mistake. In

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1615-1] New xulrunner packages fix several vulnerabilities

2008-07-25 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Wed Jul 23, 2008 at 16:41:49 -0500, Bob Tanner wrote: > > On Jul 23, 2008, at 3:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Hello. I am on vacation and out of the office from July 20th to July > >27th. If you need assistance with e-mail, web hosting, or technical > >support, please leave a

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1615-1] New xulrunner packages fix several vulnerabilities

2008-07-23 Thread Jim Popovitch
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:36 PM, Michael Gilbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wouldn't it be better to send this person a warning? i'm sure it was > just an honest mistake. it seems rather harsh to purge them from the > mailing list without giving them a fair chance to remedy their > mistake. Ho

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1615-1] New xulrunner packages fix several vulnerabilities

2008-07-23 Thread Michael Gilbert
> The correct place to report this is [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Just forward one of the mails and ask that they remove him. I > just did that, so he should be gone shortly. wouldn't it be better to send this person a warning? i'm sure it was just an honest mistake. it seems rather harsh to purge them

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1615-1] New xulrunner packages fix several vulnerabilities

2008-07-23 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 23:41, Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the mailing list. The correct place to report this is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Just forward one of the mails and ask that they remove him. I just did that, so he should be gone shortly. Ri

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1615-1] New xulrunner packages fix several vulnerabilities

2008-07-23 Thread Bob Tanner
On Jul 23, 2008, at 3:44 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. I am on vacation and out of the office from July 20th to July 27th. If you need assistance with e-mail, web hosting, or technical support, please leave a message with Danny Beckett or Ray Brown at 616-301-1037. If you have any ot

Re: [SECURITY] [DSA 1615-1] New xulrunner packages fix several vulnerabilities

2008-07-23 Thread jpalm
Hello. I am on vacation and out of the office from July 20th to July 27th. If you need assistance with e-mail, web hosting, or technical support, please leave a message with Danny Beckett or Ray Brown at 616-301-1037. If you have any other questions or messages, please leave a detailed message a