[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> now i have tried postfix and exim and i like both.
> But wich is more secure? any body some knowledge about that?
postfix has a better, more security concious, design
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> now i have tried postfix and exim and i like both.
> But wich is more secure? any body some knowledge about that?
postfix has a better, more security concious, design
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [E
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> now i have tried postfix and exim and i like both. But wich is more
> secure? any body some knowledge about that?
[snip]
I thought both had had security-related fixes recently. Find one that you
like more than the other, benchmark it yourself, test how readily you can
now i have tried postfix and exim and i like both.
But wich is more secure? any body some knowledge about that?
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Eelco van Beek wrote:
> What do you mean by dbmail stuff? It can use postfix, sendmail, exim or
> any other mailer.
>
> With mbox (maildir is
What do you mean by dbmail stuff? It can use postfix, sendmail, exim or
any other mailer.
With mbox (maildir is better) messages always need to be structured.
Dbmail saves it's messages already in a structured way, so this not
needs to be redone every time a message is being retrieved.
Regards,
Previously Eelco van Beek wrote:
> Why not put your mail into a database?. No more security and scalability
> hassles. (www.dbmail.org)
Because it restricts you to using dbmail stuff. Personally I'm very
happy with using maildirs and importing only select mailheaders in a
custom sql database so I
Why not put your mail into a database?. No more security and scalability
hassles. (www.dbmail.org)
Best regards,
Eelco
On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 19:07, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:04:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > why schould i not use exim for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> now i have tried postfix and exim and i like both. But wich is more
> secure? any body some knowledge about that?
[snip]
I thought both had had security-related fixes recently. Find one that you
like more than the other, benchmark it yourself, test how readily you can
now i have tried postfix and exim and i like both.
But wich is more secure? any body some knowledge about that?
On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 08:04:05PM +0100, Eelco van Beek wrote:
> What do you mean by dbmail stuff? It can use postfix, sendmail, exim or
> any other mailer.
>
> With mbox (maildir i
What do you mean by dbmail stuff? It can use postfix, sendmail, exim or
any other mailer.
With mbox (maildir is better) messages always need to be structured.
Dbmail saves it's messages already in a structured way, so this not
needs to be redone every time a message is being retrieved.
Regards,
Previously Eelco van Beek wrote:
> Why not put your mail into a database?. No more security and scalability
> hassles. (www.dbmail.org)
Because it restricts you to using dbmail stuff. Personally I'm very
happy with using maildirs and importing only select mailheaders in a
custom sql database so I
Why not put your mail into a database?. No more security and scalability
hassles. (www.dbmail.org)
Best regards,
Eelco
On Sat, 2002-01-19 at 19:07, Hans-Joachim Picht wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 01:04:00PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> > why schould i not use exim fo
12 matches
Mail list logo
