tica for ArialMT.
Substituting font Helvetica-Bold for Arial-BoldMT.
Page 8
Substituting font Helvetica for ArialMT.
Substituting font Helvetica-Bold for Arial-BoldMT.
Page 9
Substituting font Helvetica-Bold for Arial-BoldMT.
Substituting font Helvetica for ArialMT.
--
With kind regards,
Tom Wijnroks
all) certificates are signed under
the new SHA-256 Root, in this case DigiCert_Global_Root_G2.
I came across this issue today because of failing cURL requests to
external hosts, which installed these new DigiCert certificates.
Regards,
Tom Wijnroks
tificates under the SHA-256 Root
certificates.
Regards,
Tom Wijnroks
(20130119+deb7u1)
Is there a reason why these Digicert Root certificates are missing on
Wheezy?
With kind regards,
Tom Wijnroks
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 07:53:21PM +, Mikhail Akimov (via Google Drive)
wrote:
> I've shared an item with you:
That's very nice of you. Care to share what it is before I open it?
Cheers,
Tom
--
The horror... the horror!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ww.debian.org/MailingLists/unsubscribe to unsubscribe
from this and other Debian related lists.
You have to do that yourself, nothing is gonna change by yelling
"unsubscribe!!" to the mailing list itself.
You subscribed some time back, I'm sure you can unsubscribe too.
@rest: sorry
De rest kan je allemaal verwijderen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54c2942f.2090...@lt-box.info
On 05/12/2014 18:18, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
In times of Debian 6.x and 7.1.x images from elder versions of Debian
(like f.i. 7.0.x) were kept online for a long time. Today I had a look
at http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/ but could only find images of
the latest versions there.
You migh
The needrestart package from jessie with package defaults appears to run
automatically and suggest, but not automatically perform, necessary
service restarts.
On 09/02/2014 11:56 AM, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02 2014, Jack wrote:
>> On 02/09/2014 18:04, Jameson Graef Rollins wrot
I suggest resumption of maintenance for OVAL to support OpenSCAP.
www.debian.org/security/oval/ seems not to have been maintained since
some time in late 2010 or early 2011.
Tom Dial
On 04/23/2014 08:57 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have written a non-exhaustive list of
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 07:32:03PM +0200, herzogbrigit...@t-online.de wrote:
< Deleted bunch of HTML, most of it formatting which I'm sure had some
text, but lost patience parsing >
Could you try that again in plain text, please?
Cheers,
Tom
--
Pascal is not a high-lev
Hi,
What about the prosody version in squeeze. Is it unaffected? If so, it
may help to make it clear in the DSA.
Warm regards and thanks for the good work,
Tom
On 06/04/14 01:10, Luciano Bello wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 03:13:28PM -0600, Lustick, Richard wrote:
> Please remove me from this email.
Read the footer of the -announce mails, and unsubscribe yourself.
Cheers,
Tom
--
It is Texas law that when two trains meet each other at a railroad crossing,
each shall come to a full s
I copied the configs directly over.
Stefan Fritsch wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>-
>-
>Debian Security Advisory DSA-2298-1
>secur...@debian.org
>http://www.debian.org/security/
d: avoid dereferencing NULL pointer when accessing suspend_* sysfs
attributes (CVE-2009-2849)
-- dann frazier Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:45:27 -0600
--
Tom Vier
DSA Key ID 0x15741ECE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.d
umber there. I suppose also that a
new version should only be uploaded to volatile if the current version
will have reduced functionality as a result of changes in the new
version.
Cheers,
Tom
--
"Beware of programmers carrying screwdrivers."
-- Chip Salzenberg
si
ncept of volatile, but I would have
thought both. One built against stable goes to volatile, the other goes
to unstable.
Cheers,
Tom
--
The opossum is a very sophisticated animal. It doesn't even get up
until 5 or 6 PM.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Better to use public/private key authentication than to rely on
passwords.
On Feb 27, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Sébastien NOBILI
wrote:
Le vendredi 27 février 09 à 10:43, andy baxter a écrit :
I can make sure that the server doesn't have any incoming ports open
except http and ssh)
I would use
For any set of packages one finds so useful that they're like their own
distribution, I think the labor would be better spent -- more useful to
the community I mean, maybe not as fun for you -- in extending /
improving documentation on using those tools, or Chip's suggestion,
which looks to
Russell Coker wrote:
On Sunday 07 December 2008 16:11, "Reed Young" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
For any set of packages one finds so useful that they're like their own
distribution, I think the labor would be better spent -- more useful to the
community I mean, maybe not as fun for you -- in exte
a couple appropriate mailing lists and came up empty.)
> see http://bugs.debian.org/php4, and #259351 "php4: memory_limit vulnerability".
Thanks!
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
--
To UNSUB
vulnerable. Sarge and Sid use 4.3.4 and
probably are vulnerable. Has anyone checked?
Hmm, Red Hat doesn't seem to have any security errata about it.
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
--
To UNSUBS
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 20:50, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am looking for some scanners which look for known vulnerabilities in
> different web software.
Have a look at owasp
http://www.owasp.org/index
and their http://www.owasp.org/development/webscarab
Haven't gotten round to trying
On Wed, 2004-04-07 at 20:50, Micah Anderson wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I am looking for some scanners which look for known vulnerabilities in
> different web software.
Have a look at owasp
http://www.owasp.org/index
and their http://www.owasp.org/development/webscarab
Haven't gotten round to trying
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 17:45, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> When you fetch your mail from your local mailserver you pass it
> through the spam filter, which in turn checks the spam db and ignores
> spam.
Sounds an awful lot like a regular spamassassin install, pull the mail
through the filter whic
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 17:45, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> When you fetch your mail from your local mailserver you pass it
> through the spam filter, which in turn checks the spam db and ignores
> spam.
Sounds an awful lot like a regular spamassassin install, pull the mail
through the filter whic
Thanks for all the suggestions, everyone. I wound up going with the
usermin interface (we were looking for something we could do quickly
and reliably; we also didn't have a horde install at the time.) So
far, it's working like a charm.
~Tom White
Thanks for all the suggestions, everyone. I wound up going with the
usermin interface (we were looking for something we could do quickly
and reliably; we also didn't have a horde install at the time.) So
far, it's working like a charm.
~Tom White
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
g I can confidently
deploy within a few hours. Again, if something exists.
~Tom White
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:22:55AM -0300, Martin Arrieta wrote:
> may be u can make a cgi and with sudo u can change tha user passwd..
>
> but.. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK :)
>
> bye
>
> El v
ything out there that someone has had good experiences with?
~Tom White
PS - how do you fit down the chimney? and please don't leave coal in
my stocking this year.
g I can confidently
deploy within a few hours. Again, if something exists.
~Tom White
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 12:22:55AM -0300, Martin Arrieta wrote:
> may be u can make a cgi and with sudo u can change tha user passwd..
>
> but.. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK :)
>
> bye
>
> El v
ything out there that someone has had good experiences with?
~Tom White
PS - how do you fit down the chimney? and please don't leave coal in
my stocking this year.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
use a
known-secure boot medium to examine every file on your filesystem that
might be run with root privileges...
Or you can check to see if he made it easy for him to find with the
and packages. There are probably better options
which people on this list could suggest.
--
T
use a
known-secure boot medium to examine every file on your filesystem that
might be run with root privileges...
Or you can check to see if he made it easy for him to find with the
and packages. There are probably better options
which people on this list could suggest.
--
T
root privileges is more secure than it keeping group video privileges.
Thanks,
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
root privileges is more secure than it keeping group video privileges.
Thanks,
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
can get to root in a way other than the command
if things break.
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
can get to root in a way other than the command
if things break.
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:57:13PM -0300, Ricardo Abrantes wrote:
> Thank you Tom (and thank you François), but is there a way to block users
> from Internet to use my server like this?
Since Apache is not configured to be a proxy by default, I am sure your
server is not seriously being
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 09:57:13PM -0300, Ricardo Abrantes wrote:
> Thank you Tom (and thank you François), but is there a way to block users
> from Internet to use my server like this?
Since Apache is not configured to be a proxy by default, I am sure your
server is not seriously being
you discovered.
However, it seems they are failing, and that Apache is saying "Document
not found" in answer to the odd request.
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
you discovered.
However, it seems they are failing, and that Apache is saying "Document
not found" in answer to the odd request.
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
The signature is bad at my end, and my end usually works so it looks
like something mangled your message.
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
The signature is bad at my end, and my end usually works so it looks
like something mangled your message.
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash
internet-listening servers as possible.
A total of zero internet-listening servers is a good goal for a desktop
machine.
And lastly, if you still need to run an FTP server, I recommend VSFTPD.
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
internet-listening servers as possible.
A total of zero internet-listening servers is a good goal for a desktop
machine.
And lastly, if you still need to run an FTP server, I recommend VSFTPD.
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consulting
nerable to this hole?
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
nerable to this hole?
--
Tom Goulet mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
UID0 Unix Consultingweb: em.ca/uid0/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
whom that lawyer selects can access or download that
> document. It must be secure, auditable and keep lawyers happy!
>
> Please ask Q's from here!
I can't help you with your actual problem, but I would suggest posting this as
a new thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I suspect many people are
completely ignoring the parent thread (since it is not strictly
debian-security), so your question may not be noticed.
Good luck, I hope someone else can help you with your actual problem,
Tom
selects can access or download that
> document. It must be secure, auditable and keep lawyers happy!
>
> Please ask Q's from here!
I can't help you with your actual problem, but I would suggest posting this as
a new thread on [EMAIL PROTECTED] I suspect many people are
complete
--
Tom Vergote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Tom Vergote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
to some other address, in additionto the above
Deliver your mail via procmail (exim's default configuration is to do
this if you have a file ~/.procmailrc). Then get procmail to to do
the bounce and forwards based on the X-Spam-Status header.
Tom
--
Tom Cook
Information Technology S
to some other address, in additionto the above
Deliver your mail via procmail (exim's default configuration is to do
this if you have a file ~/.procmailrc). Then get procmail to to do
the bounce and forwards based on the X-Spam-Status header.
Tom
--
Tom Cook
Information Technology S
On 0, Jean Christophe ANDR? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Cook ?crivait :
> > What the
> > What's wrong with 'lsof -i :111' and 'lsof -i :16001'?
>
> Nothing wrong with it! :)
>
> > It tells you precisely what's attempting
On 0, Jean Christophe ANDR? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tom Cook ?crivait :
> > What the
> > What's wrong with 'lsof -i :111' and 'lsof -i :16001'?
>
> Nothing wrong with it! :)
>
> > It tells you precisely what's attempting
(by programming),
> but this one is the easier I can think by know... :)
What the
What's wrong with 'lsof -i :111' and 'lsof -i :16001'? It tells you
precisely what's attempting to connect...
Tom
--
Tom Cook
Information Technology Services, The University o
(by programming),
> but this one is the easier I can think by know... :)
What the
What's wrong with 'lsof -i :111' and 'lsof -i :16001'? It tells you
precisely what's attempting to connect...
Tom
--
Tom Cook
Information Technology Services, The University o
unny 26 degrees
here...
Anyway, a google search for "port 16001" tells me that port 16001 is
the default port for esd, the e(nlightenment?) sound daemon. So check
if you have esd running, and if there are any apps that are trying to
connect to it (is your wm trying to play sounds when you click on
unny 26 degrees
here...
Anyway, a google search for "port 16001" tells me that port 16001 is
the default port for esd, the e(nlightenment?) sound daemon. So check
if you have esd running, and if there are any apps that are trying to
connect to it (is your wm trying to play sounds when you click on
On 0, "Ian H. Greenhoe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> BTW: netstat vs. lsof:
>
> netstat is more likely to be installed than lsof, and only shows relevant
> items when you are wondering about net connections to process IDs.
What irrelevant items does '
On 0, "Ian H. Greenhoe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> BTW: netstat vs. lsof:
>
> netstat is more likely to be installed than lsof, and only shows relevant
> items when you are wondering about net connections to process IDs.
What irrelevant items does '
her issue?
>
> Your comments and ideas are the most welcome.
apt-get install lsof
lsof -i (as root)
Tom
--
Tom Cook
Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide
"Other people's priorities are endlessly odd."
- Kingsley Amis
Get my GPG p
her issue?
>
> Your comments and ideas are the most welcome.
apt-get install lsof
lsof -i (as root)
Tom
--
Tom Cook
Information Technology Services, The University of Adelaide
"Other people's priorities are endlessly odd."
- Kingsley Amis
Get my GPG p
around here, abuse just doesn't
cut it. Post a message like, 'Fix this or I'll change to another
distribution,' or, 'You didn't help me,' that'll get the hackles up
(judging by the wars on deb-user, anyway).
Tom
--
Tom Cook
Information Technology Servi
around here, abuse just doesn't
cut it. Post a message like, 'Fix this or I'll change to another
distribution,' or, 'You didn't help me,' that'll get the hackles up
(judging by the wars on deb-user, anyway).
Tom
--
Tom Cook
Information Technology Servi
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 09:52:19AM +0200, Jan Niehusmann wrote:
>
> Another possible solution would be:
>
> ssh -L 2000:remotehost:22 firewall
>
> and then, again on the local machine:
>
> ssh -X -p 2000 localhost
>
> This way, you have a direct ssh connection between both computers
> involved
On Sat, Jul 13, 2002 at 11:18:31PM +0200, James Nord wrote:
> Tom Hoover wrote:
> >How do I connect to the desktop computer _thru_ the firewall and use X11
> >forwarding? Do I have to setup ssh port forwarding on the firewall? Do
> >I have to setup some other VPN softwa
I have a related question. I have no trouble using X11 forwarding from
within my LAN, but how do I punch thru my firewall using ssh? Here's my
setup:
a = firewall/router running potato
b = desktop running woody
c = laptop running woody
If the laptop (c) is connected directly to my LAN (either w
to explicitly state
"woody" in your sources.list, and then change it when woody is no longer
the name for testing? Thanks.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Noah L. Meyerhans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:39 PM
To: Moti Levy
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Sub
Thanks for all the rapid replies folks, apparently I was mixed up there.
Adding the security line for "testing" did the trick.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: A.J. Rossini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2002 4:29 PM
To: Tom Dominico
Cc: debian-security@lists.
ought that was just for stable users who need security updates. Am I
missing something really obvious? Any guidance is greatly appreciated,
thanks.
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you happen to know if debs are available? I don't see any using
apt-cache search. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hassard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Tom Dominico
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Configur
Do you happen to know if debs are available? I don't see any using
apt-cache search. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Hassard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 12:19 PM
To: Tom Dominico
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Configuration problems
is point, I am having a hard time troubleshooting. Can anyone point
me in the proper direction?
Thanks,
Tom Dominico
Technology Coordinator
Parlier Unified School District
(559) 646-2731
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At
this point, I am having a hard time troubleshooting. Can anyone point
me in the proper direction?
Thanks,
Tom Dominico
Technology Coordinator
Parlier Unified School District
(559) 646-2731
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
way for people to login? Is SSL an option, and if so, how do I
go about using it? Do I have to purchase a certificate? Or is there
some other option? Finally, should I be using .htaccess at all, or is
there a better way? Thank you in advance for your advice.
Tom Dominico
Technology Coordinator
way for people to login? Is SSL an option, and if so, how do I
go about using it? Do I have to purchase a certificate? Or is there
some other option? Finally, should I be using .htaccess at all, or is
there a better way? Thank you in advance for your advice.
Tom Dominico
Technology Coordinator
d traffic, or is there another solution I should examine?
I greatly appreciate any advice.
Tom Dominico
District Technology Coordinator
Parlier Unified School District
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d traffic, or is there another solution I should examine?
I greatly appreciate any advice.
Tom Dominico
District Technology Coordinator
Parlier Unified School District
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:25:04PM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote:
> Hmmm I don't buy that this *couldn't* be done on the Intel.
> I might be overstepping my knowledge, but I'm sure there
> *must* be a way.
The first method that comes to mind is making the stack segment
non-executable. IIRC, this i
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 03:25:04PM -0500, Gary MacDougall wrote:
> Hmmm I don't buy that this *couldn't* be done on the Intel.
> I might be overstepping my knowledge, but I'm sure there
> *must* be a way.
The first method that comes to mind is making the stack segment
non-executable. IIRC, this
ng is running via inetd or
if it is standalone, and how to disable it. I think those documents should
answer all your questions. Have fun, hope this helps.
Tom
P.S. Sorry for having the reply above your message, Outlook does not really
do replies in the manner that I prefer... :(
-Original Me
ng is running via inetd or
if it is standalone, and how to disable it. I think those documents should
answer all your questions. Have fun, hope this helps.
Tom
P.S. Sorry for having the reply above your message, Outlook does not really
do replies in the manner that I prefer... :(
-Original Me
..
but I don't have a snort, and this message I got second times, first time
I benn to busy and just ignore, but that seems to be repeat...
Tom
>
> Previously Tom Breza wrote:
> > Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
> > don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
>
> Do you have snort installed?
Hi Wichert
No I don't have a snort in the
Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
also is strage a X-UIDL,
what can generate that kind of mail and why is empty?
Tom
Type Bits/KeyIDDate User ID
pub 1024/0B22D0E1 2001/
..
but I don't have a snort, and this message I got second times, first time
I benn to busy and just ignore, but that seems to be repeat...
Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Previously Tom Breza wrote:
> > Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
> > don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
>
> Do you have snort installed?
Hi Wichert
No I don't have a snort in the
Hi I got this today in my mail box, this is generated by somthing but I
don't know what is it? Why I got message from root? and why is empty?
also is strage a X-UIDL,
what can generate that kind of mail and why is empty?
Tom
Type Bits/KeyIDDate User ID
pub 1024/0B22D0E1 2001/
the src is ip is non of my IP, how is that possible?
is it part of the connection? which was initializated by one of my boxes?
then didn't get replay?
why there is no any of my local IP?
How they get to my logs
any sugestion will be greate help
I put some log from my router
see the src is ip is non of my IP, how is that possible?
is it part of the connection? which was initializated by one of my boxes?
then didn't get replay?
why there is no any of my local IP?
How they get to my logs
any sugestion will be greate help
I put some log from my router
Tom
5fez4-00018h-00 <= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=fetch
P=local S=7222 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2001-09-08 11:05:06 15fez3-00018Y-00 => fetch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D=procmail T=procmail_pipe
2001-09-08 11:05:06 15fez3-00018Y-00 Completed
2001-09-08 11:05:06 15fez4-00018h-00 => tom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
AIL PROTECTED] U=fetch
P=local S=7222 id=hH2COC.A.ymB.6dem7@murphy
2001-09-08 11:05:06 15fez3-00018Y-00 => fetch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
D=procmail T=procmail_pipe
2001-09-08 11:05:06 15fez3-00018Y-00 Completed
2001-09-08 11:05:06 15fez4-00018h-00 => tom
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> D=localu
> There's recently been quite a discussion about this here or on
> debian-firewall. There are proposals to register somewhere whether you
> want an installed service started or not (on a per-service basis). Look
> at the archives for details.
>
> HTH, Erik.
> --
hmmm do u know address of archive
> There's recently been quite a discussion about this here or on
> debian-firewall. There are proposals to register somewhere whether you
> want an installed service started or not (on a per-service basis). Look
> at the archives for details.
>
> HTH, Erik.
> --
hmmm do u know address of archive
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
