Thijs Kinkhorst a écrit :
> On Sat, March 3, 2012 02:52, Chris Frey wrote:
>> I've done the latest update, but apt-cache show file still shows
>> version 5.04-5 available, instead of 5.04-5+squeeze1.
>
> You are probably using one of the following archs:
> armel i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i
Hello,
Florian Weimer wrote :
>
> - -
> Debian Security Advisory DSA-2422-1 secur...@debian.org
> http://www.debian.org/security/Florian Weimer
> February 29, 2012
with rsync and don't
like to get a report that all the inodes have changed.
cheers pascal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debi
Hi,
In the recently published Firefox update (3.0.14), several security
vulnerabilities have been fixed. Now, since obviously Debian doesn’t include
new upstream releases in stable (3.0.14 was accepted in unstable though), I
was wondering if Iceweasel is affected by these security vulnerabiliti
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 02:09:48PM -0400, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-02 at 11:23 -0400, Roberto C. S??nchez wrote:
> > In any case, I really would be interested in hearing from people who
> > have managed to get a spam filtering setup going that allows only a
> > 0.66% false negative ra
le?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Daniel
"log level = 2" in the global section of smb.conf will do the trick.
gruss pascal
le?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> Daniel
"log level = 2" in the global section of smb.conf will do the trick.
gruss pascal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
't know that there's a good solution.
skip the "fail text" part and you will never see them again.
deliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
seen save /home/admin/Mail/viruses
is much better.
(the second one will complaining about permissions if it's
not your own .forward)
gruss
pascal
't know that there's a good solution.
skip the "fail text" part and you will never see them again.
deliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
or
seen save /home/admin/Mail/viruses
is much better.
(the second one will complaining about permissions if it's
not your own .forward)
gruss
pascal
.
As usual never ever take automated action based on a simple thing
like filename or whatever. Sort them to a special mailbox and let a
human look at it.
(me beeing very annoyed about all these "there was a virus in your mail"
I get on top of the mess)
These filters can fend of
.
As usual never ever take automated action based on a simple thing
like filename or whatever. Sort them to a special mailbox and let a
human look at it.
(me beeing very annoyed about all these "there was a virus in your mail"
I get on top of the mess)
These filters can fend off a lot of this stuff and are very cheap
(in price and CPU-time). I can only recommend using it (the right way).
gruss
pascal
case "mailscanner" from woody is broken since it does a
pid=`/bin/ps axww | /bin/grep /usr/sbin/mailscanner
but there are very likly others
Is this just me doing something wrong?
tks and greeting
pascal
Am Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:43:05AM +1200, Matthew Grant sagte:
> Hi There
case "mailscanner" from woody is broken since it does a
pid=`/bin/ps axww | /bin/grep /usr/sbin/mailscanner
but there are very likly others
Is this just me doing something wrong?
tks and greeting
pascal
Am Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:43:05AM +1200, Matthew Grant sagte:
> Hi There
13 matches
Mail list logo
