Re: apt sources.list: inconsistency between sarge and stable

2005-08-30 Thread kurt kuene
nope, there is no difference now, after the update. if it was before i can not tell anymore because i have updated all my hosts... On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:46:37 +0100 Sam Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a difference in the output of "apt-cache policy php4" when you > have a 'sarge

apt sources.list: inconsistency between sarge and stable

2005-08-30 Thread kurt kuene
hi i run sarge. there were the php4 (and more) security updates recently. #--- my /etc/apt/sources.list contains this line: deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free -- now when i make: apt-get update apt-get upgrade it will make the courier upgrade but not the php4 php4

Re: using sarge on production machines

2005-02-18 Thread kurt kuene
hi David Ehle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IF, I had, say late last year heard that Sarge was going > stable REAL SOON, > and was trying to decide if I was going to go through the hoops being > described, or just do an early upgrade, since there WAS at the time a > working security repository for

Re: using sarge on production machines

2005-02-18 Thread kurt kuene
hi first thanks a lot. you all helped me very much. apparently running stable with backports is best. so I made the wrong decision upgrading my systems to sarge. :( I did this because I thought it will come out soon and It is safe enough to use it. This was six month ago. If I could turn back tim

using sarge on production machines

2005-02-17 Thread kurt kuene
hi * I have to use testing (sarge). * All of my 3 webservers (apache php mysql java tomcat). on two other webserver I run woody with some packages from sarge (apt-pining) and the mail relay servers (spamassasin amavisd postfix clamav). I run sarge because I need more recent packages and I do no