hi Ted
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:19:43AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote:
> Hmmm, my bad
>
> No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could
> not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist?
>
not a faq, but i think solutions disscussed here go there:
http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#secu
hi Ted
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 09:19:43AM -0800, Ted Parvu wrote:
> Hmmm, my bad
>
> No need to dredge up an old topic. However, I could
> not find a FAQ for this list? Does one exist?
>
not a faq, but i think solutions disscussed here go there:
http://www.debian.org/doc/user-manuals#secu
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, Willi Dyck wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 01:33:30PM -0400, Phillip Hofmeister did this all
> over the keyboard:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It is possible your rootkit check sent up a false flag. It is also possible
> > (though unlikely) the attacker rigged the kernel to report any c
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> I have a hard disk on /dev/hda and a CDROM drive on /dev/hdc.
> Their permissions are:
> brw-rw1 root disk 3, 0 Jul 6 2000 /dev/hda
> brw-rw1 root disk 22, 0 Jul 6 2000 /dev/hdc
> I want to access the CDROM drive
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Oohara Yuuma wrote:
> I have a hard disk on /dev/hda and a CDROM drive on /dev/hdc.
> Their permissions are:
> brw-rw1 root disk 3, 0 Jul 6 2000 /dev/hda
> brw-rw1 root disk 22, 0 Jul 6 2000 /dev/hdc
> I want to access the CDROM drive
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, J. Paul Bruns-Bielkowicz wrote:
> Hi,
> I disabled all but a few ports in /etc/services, but I have
> tcp0 0 pa237.olsztyn.sdi.t:111 80.116.215.37:1064
> ESTABLISHED
> when I netstat my machine. What exactly does this mean? I just want
> 25/tcp opensmtp
On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, J. Paul Bruns-Bielkowicz wrote:
> Hi,
> I disabled all but a few ports in /etc/services, but I have
> tcp0 0 pa237.olsztyn.sdi.t:111 80.116.215.37:1064
> ESTABLISHED
> when I netstat my machine. What exactly does this mean? I just want
> 25/tcp opensmt
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Roger Keays wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this is common knowledge or not, but I have just noticed
> the effects of having the first two letters of your password the same as
> the first two in your login name... You can use any extension of your
> password!!
>
> e.g., on my
On Fri, 30 Nov 2001, Roger Keays wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this is common knowledge or not, but I have just noticed
> the effects of having the first two letters of your password the same as
> the first two in your login name... You can use any extension of your
> password!!
>
> e.g., on my
9 matches
Mail list logo
